Literature DB >> 21350883

The ability to use nitrate confers advantage to Dekkera bruxellensis over S. cerevisiae and can explain its adaptation to industrial fermentation processes.

Will de Barros Pita1, Fernanda Cristina Bezerra Leite, Anna Theresa de Souza Liberal, Diogo Ardaillon Simões, Marcos Antonio de Morais.   

Abstract

The yeast Dekkera bruxellensis has been regarded as a contamination problem in industrial ethanol production because it can replace the originally inoculated Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. The present study deals with the influence of nitrate on the relative competitiveness of D. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae in sugar cane ethanol fermentations. The industrial strain D. bruxellensis GDB 248 showed higher growth rates than S. cerevisiae JP1 strain in mixed ammonia/nitrate media, and nitrate assimilation genes were only slightly repressed by ammonia. These characteristics rendered D. bruxellensis cells with an ability to overcome S. cerevisiae populations in both synthetic medium and in sugar cane juice. The results were corroborated by data from industrial fermentations that showed a correlation between high nitrate concentrations and high D. bruxellensis cell counts. Moreover, the presence of nitrate increased fermentation efficiency of D. bruxellensis cells in anaerobic conditions, which may explain the maintenance of ethanol production in the presence of D. bruxellensis in industrial processes. The presence of high levels of nitrate in sugar cane juice may be due to its inefficient conversion by plant metabolism in certain soil types and could explain the periodical episodes of D. bruxellensis colonization of Brazilian ethanol plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350883     DOI: 10.1007/s10482-011-9568-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek        ISSN: 0003-6072            Impact factor:   2.271


  14 in total

1.  Assessing genetic diversity among Brettanomyces yeasts by DNA fingerprinting and whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Sam Crauwels; Bo Zhu; Jan Steensels; Pieter Busschaert; Gorik De Samblanx; Kathleen Marchal; Kris A Willems; Kevin J Verstrepen; Bart Lievens
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of Oxygen Availability on Acetic Acid Tolerance and Intracellular pH in Dekkera bruxellensis.

Authors:  Claudia Capusoni; Stefania Arioli; Paolo Zambelli; M Moktaduzzaman; Diego Mora; Concetta Compagno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of single and combined cell treatments based on low pH and high concentrations of ethanol on the growth and fermentation of Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ana Paula Guarnieri Bassi; Jéssica Carolina Gomes da Silva; Vanda Renata Reis; Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The consequences of Lactobacillus vini and Dekkera bruxellensis as contaminants of the sugarcane-based ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Rafael Barros de Souza; Billy Manoel dos Santos; Raquel de Fátima Rodrigues de Souza; Paula Katharina Nogueira da Silva; Brígida Thais Luckwu Lucena; Marcos Antonio de Morais
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Utilization of nitrate abolishes the "Custers effect" in Dekkera bruxellensis and determines a different pattern of fermentation products.

Authors:  Silvia Galafassi; Claudia Capusoni; Md Moktaduzzaman; Concetta Compagno
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Chromosomal genome assembly of the ethanol production strain CBS 11270 indicates a highly dynamic genome structure in the yeast species Brettanomyces bruxellensis.

Authors:  Ievgeniia A Tiukova; Mats E Pettersson; Marc P Hoeppner; Remi-Andre Olsen; Max Käller; Jens Nielsen; Jacques Dainat; Henrik Lantz; Jonas Söderberg; Volkmar Passoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transcriptome of the alternative ethanol production strain Dekkera bruxellensis CBS 11270 in sugar limited, low oxygen cultivation.

Authors:  Ievgeniia A Tiukova; Mats E Petterson; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Ignas Bunikis; Thomas Eberhard; Olga Vinnere Pettersson; Volkmar Passoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Insights into the Dekkera bruxellensis genomic landscape: comparative genomics reveals variations in ploidy and nutrient utilisation potential amongst wine isolates.

Authors:  Anthony R Borneman; Ryan Zeppel; Paul J Chambers; Chris D Curtin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  The wine and beer yeast Dekkera bruxellensis.

Authors:  Anna Judith Schifferdecker; Sofia Dashko; Olena P Ishchuk; Jure Piškur
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.239

10.  Alcohol dehydrogenase gene ADH3 activates glucose alcoholic fermentation in genetically engineered Dekkera bruxellensis yeast.

Authors:  Anna Judith Schifferdecker; Juozas Siurkus; Mikael Rørdam Andersen; Dorte Joerck-Ramberg; Zhihao Ling; Nerve Zhou; James E Blevins; Andriy A Sibirny; Jure Piškur; Olena P Ishchuk
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.