Literature DB >> 22842954

Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically?

Scott Yang1, Eric Feuchtbaum, Brian C Werner, Woojin Cho, Vasantha Reddi, Vincent Arlet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) often present with a disfiguring shoulder imbalance. Shoulder balance (Sh.B) is of significant importance to the patient's self-perception. Previous studies have correlated Sh.B with respect to only the clinical posterior view correlated with radiographs. It is important, however, to address Sh.B with respect to anterior view of the patients' shoulders as if patients were viewing in a mirror. In this study, we evaluated the anterior Sh.B and correlated it with posterior Sh.B clinically and radiographically in Lenke type 1 and 2 curves.
METHOD: An online scoliosis database was queried to identify 74 AIS patients with Lenke 1 (n = 55, age 15.28 ± 3.35) and 2 (n = 19, age 15.66 ± 3.72) curves with a complete set of PA radiographs and anterior and posterior photos. Radiographic measures for Sh.B included Cobb angles, T1 tilt, first rib angle, and clavicle-rib intersection angle. Clinical measures for Sh.B included inner shoulder angle, outer shoulder angle, and axillary fold angle. Regression analysis with Pearson's correlation and ANOVA for statistical significance was used for analysis.
RESULTS: For Lenke 1 curves, there was moderate statistically significant correlation between anterior and posterior clinical Sh.B (R = 0.35-0.41). There was only weak to moderate correlation between radiographic and clinical measures. For Lenke 2 curves, there was a weak to moderate correlation between anterior and posterior clinical Sh.B (R = 0.25-0.45), though not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant correlation between any radiographic measures and posterior Sh.B. There was, however, moderate and significant correlation between radiographic measures and anterior Sh.B.
CONCLUSION: There is no strong correlation between anterior and posterior clinical Sh.B, and surgeons should evaluate both sides in planning deformity correction, especially in Lenke 2 curves. None of the radiographic measures showed strong correlation (R > 0.8) with anterior or posterior clinical Sh.B. A stronger correlation existed between radiographic measures and anterior Sh.B measurements compared with posterior clinical Sh.B measurements in Lenke 2 curves further necessitating anterior evaluation in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842954      PMCID: PMC3463704          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2434-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference?

Authors:  W K Payne; J W Ogilvie; M D Resnick; R L Kane; E E Transfeldt; R W Blum
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Psychological evaluations of patients operated for idiopathic scoliosis by the Harrington method.

Authors:  E Orvomaa
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Sean M Jones-Quaidoo; Matthew Eager; Justin W Griffin; Vasantha Reddi; Wendy Novicoff; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Helton Defino; Jean Ouellet; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Four radiological measures to estimate shoulder balance in scoliosis.

Authors:  J Bagó; L Carrera; B March; C Villanueva
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Selection of fusion levels for posterior instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H A King
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery.

Authors:  A J Danielsson; I Wiklund; K Pehrsson; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve.

Authors:  Xu-sheng Qiu; Wei-wei Ma; Wei-guo Li; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-zhang Zhu; Bang-ping Qian; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Bobby K W Ng; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akel; Murat Pekmezci; Mutlu Hayran; Yasemin Genc; Ozgur Kocak; Orhan Derman; Ilkay Erdoğan; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Lenke type I-VI case studies.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Vasantha Reddi
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects.

Authors:  Marc A Asher; Douglas C Burton
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-03-31
View more
  10 in total

1.  Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Parameters leading to a successful radiographic outcome following surgical treatment for Lenke 2 curves.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Anna McClung; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Daniel Sucato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do Current Recommendations for Upper Instrumented Vertebra Predict Shoulder Imbalance? An Attempted Validation of Level Selection for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Benjamin T Bjerke; Zoe B Cheung; Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter B Derman; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-27

5.  Clinical photography in severe idiopathic scoliosis candidate for surgery: is it a useful tool to differentiate among Lenke patterns?

Authors:  Juan Bago; Javier Pizones; Antonia Matamalas; Elisa D'Agata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Achieving Shoulder Balance Using Medial and Lateral Radiological Measures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Pawin Gajaseni; Luca Labianca; Piyush Kalakoti; Stuart Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

7.  Is there an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle to prevent post-operative shoulder imbalance and neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients?

Authors:  M K Kwan; C Y W Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reliability and validity study of measurements on digital photography to evaluate shoulder balance in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-12-14

9.  The Amount of Relative Curve Correction Is More Important Than Upper Instrumented Vertebra Selection for Ensuring Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke Type 1 and Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  John Alex Sielatycki; Meghan Cerpa; Eduardo C Beauchamp; Takayoshi Shimizu; Chao Wei; Suthipas Pongmanee; Hui Wang; Rui Xue; Rongping Zhou; Xinchun Liu; Jun Yang; Yuan Suomao; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio: An Objective Measure to Guide against Overcorrection of a Main Thoracic Curve in the Setting of a Structural Proximal Thoracic Curve.

Authors:  Matthew R Landrum; Andrew H Milby; Burt Yaszay; Stefan Parent; Susan E Nelson; Joshua M Pahys; Amer F Samdani; Anthony C Capraro; John M Flynn; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.