Literature DB >> 18027001

Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters.

Ibrahim Akel1, Murat Pekmezci1, Mutlu Hayran2, Yasemin Genc3, Ozgur Kocak1, Orhan Derman4, Ilkay Erdoğan4, Muharrem Yazici5.   

Abstract

A descriptive clinical study in healthy adolescents was done to evaluate the clinical shoulder balance and analyze the correlation between clinical and radiological parameters which are currently used to evaluate shoulder balance. In addition to trunk shift and rib hump, shoulder balance is one of the criteria that are used to evaluate the outcomes in spinal deformity surgery. Several methods have been proposed to evaluate the shoulder balance in scoliotic patients; however, there is no uniformity to these methods in the current literature. Patients who applied to pediatric clinic without musculoskeletal pathology formed the patient population. Volunteers were asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing shoulder balance perception and had their clinical photograph taken simultaneously with a P-A chest X-ray. The clinical shoulder balance was evaluated through analysis of the clinical photograph. The X-rays were used to evaluate the radiological shoulder balance. The evaluated parameters included coracoid height difference (CHD), clavicular angle (CA), the clavicle-rib cage intersection difference (CRID), clavicular tilt angle difference (CTAD), and T1-tilt. The study group was composed of 48 male and 43 female patients with an average age of 13.6 +/- 2.1 (10-18) years. In the questionnaire, all patients stated that their shoulders were level. The digital photographs revealed that only 17(18.7%) adolescents had absolutely level shoulders. The average height difference between shoulders was 7.5 +/- 5.8 mm. The average CHD was 6.9 +/- 5.8 mm, average CA was 2.2 +/- 1.7 degrees , average CRID was 4.8 +/- 3.6 mm, average CTAD was 4 +/- 3.2 degrees , and average T1-tilt was 1.3 +/- 1.4 degrees . CHD, CA, and CRID demonstrated high correlation with clinical pictures, whereas CTAD demonstrated moderate and T1-tilt demonstrated only mild correlation. The radiological parameters used to evaluate the shoulder balance correlate with the clinical appearance. Contrary to popular belief, shoulder balance in healthy adolescents often does not exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18027001      PMCID: PMC2270384          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0546-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  5 in total

1.  Trunk positioning accuracy in children 7-18 years old.

Authors:  J A Ashton-Miller; K M McGlashen; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Four radiological measures to estimate shoulder balance in scoliosis.

Authors:  J Bagó; L Carrera; B March; C Villanueva
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Analysis of the upper thoracic curve in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis. A new concept of the double thoracic curve pattern.

Authors:  C K Lee; F Denis; R B Winter; J E Lonstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Abdominal reflexes.

Authors:  D Yngve
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 5.  Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Lawrence G Lenke; Eric J Graham; Douglas S Won; Fred A Sweet; K M Blanke; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

  5 in total
  27 in total

1.  What is the variability in shoulder, axillae and waist position in a group of adolescents?

Authors:  Adrian Gardner; Fiona Berryman; Paul Pynsent
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Parameters leading to a successful radiographic outcome following surgical treatment for Lenke 2 curves.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Anna McClung; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Daniel Sucato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the curvature types.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Si-Young Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Role of shoulder gradient in the pathogenesis of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Amir Sobhani Eraghi; Mikaiel Hajializade; Ehsan Shekarchizadeh; Shadi Abdollahi Kordkandi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  Impact of pelvic obliquity on coronal alignment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tomohiro Banno; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Sho Kobayashi; Tatsuya Yasuda; Hideyuki Arima; Shin Oe; Hiroki Ushirozako; Tomohiro Yamada; Koichiro Ide; Yuh Watanabe; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-05-26

8.  A comparison of the effects of two different techniques on shoulder balance in the treatment of congenital scoliosis: Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib and dual growing rod.

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Yunus Emre Akman; Mehmet Bulent Balioglu; Sinan Erdogan
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

9.  Is neck tilt and shoulder imbalance the same phenomenon? A prospective analysis of 89 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1 and 2).

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Kai Ann Wong; Chee Kean Lee; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Eric Feuchtbaum; Brian C Werner; Woojin Cho; Vasantha Reddi; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.