Literature DB >> 9201842

Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference?

W K Payne1, J W Ogilvie, M D Resnick, R L Kane, E E Transfeldt, R W Blum.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A population-based case-control study, we identified adolescents with and without scoliosis in Minnesota who were 12 through 18 years of age. Matched control subjects were randomly selected from school children who did not have scoliosis or any other condition. Information on scoliosis was obtained by a self-administered questionnaire, the Adolescent Health Survey. Collected on more than 75,000 school age adolescents, with established validity and reliability, a secondary analysis of adolescents with scoliosis was performed as compared with a normative peer group.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and characterize the psychosocial impact of scoliosis on the areas of peer relations, body image, and health-compromising behavior, such as suicidal thought and alcohol consumption. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The impact of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has not been assessed using generic health status measures appropriate for adolescents. Previous studies have concentrated on the health status of adults by measuring work status, marriage status, and other adult measures. The purpose of this study was to study the health status of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, using the Adolescent Health Survey, a generic health status measure with established validity and reliability.
METHODS: Body image, peer relations, social and high-risk behavior, and comparative health were assessed to determine if scoliosis was an independent risk factor and to determine if scoliosis was associated with these psychosocial issues.
RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-five cases of scoliosis were identified from the 34,706 adolescents. The prevalence was 1.97%. Of the 685 adolescents with scoliosis and their control subjects, the adjusted odds ratio for having suicidal thought among adolescent with scoliosis, compared to adolescents without scoliosis, was 1.40 (P value of 0.04) after adjustment for race, gender, socioeconomic status, and age. The adjusted odds ratio for having feelings about poor body development among adolescents with scoliosis was 1.82 (P value 0.001) compared with adolescents without scoliosis after adjustment for race, gender, socioeconomic status, and age. Scoliosis was an independent risk factor for suicidal thought, worry and concern over body development, and peer interactions after adjustment.
CONCLUSION: Scoliosis is a significant risk factor for psychosocial issues and health-compromising behavior. Gender differences exist in male and female adolescents with scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9201842     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199706150-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  43 in total

1.  Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Sean M Jones-Quaidoo; Matthew Eager; Justin W Griffin; Vasantha Reddi; Wendy Novicoff; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Helton Defino; Jean Ouellet; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The influence of pregnancy on women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Michael C Dewan; Nishit Mummareddy; Christopher Bonfield
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Responsiveness of the EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Carlos King Ho Wong; Sin Ting Lau; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis better correlates to quality of life measurements than the spinal assessment questionnaire in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 6.  Idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Per Trobisch; Olaf Suess; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Children's and parents' perspectives of health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Konstantia Damianou; Eleni Stamatopoulou; Anastasios Kalampokis; Ioannis Loukos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-19

8.  Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Eric Feuchtbaum; Brian C Werner; Woojin Cho; Vasantha Reddi; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire--Scoliosis Version.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Baron S Lonner; Canice E Crerand; Suken A Shah; John M Flynn; Tracey Bastrom; Phedra Penn; Jennifer Ahn; Courtney Toombs; Neil Bharucha; Whitney P Bowe; Peter O Newton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Reversal of childhood idiopathic scoliosis in an adult, without surgery: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  William J Brooks; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Martha C Hawes
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.