Literature DB >> 22842727

Effect of compression paddle tilt correction on volumetric breast density estimation.

Michiel G J Kallenberg1, Carla H van Gils, Mariëtte Lokate, Gerard J den Heeten, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

For the acquisition of a mammogram, a breast is compressed between a compression paddle and a support table. When compression is applied with a flexible compression paddle, the upper plate may be tilted, which results in variation in breast thickness from the chest wall to the breast margin. Paddle tilt has been recognized as a major problem in volumetric breast density estimation methods. In previous work, we developed a fully automatic method to correct the image for the effect of compression paddle tilt. In this study, we investigated in three experiments the effect of paddle tilt and its correction on volumetric breast density estimation. Results showed that paddle tilt considerably affected accuracy of volumetric breast density estimation, but that effect could be reduced by tilt correction. By applying tilt correction, a significant increase in correspondence between mammographic density estimates and measurements on MRI was established. We argue that in volumetric breast density estimation, tilt correction is both feasible and essential when mammographic images are acquired with a flexible compression paddle.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842727     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Measurement of breast tissue composition with dual energy cone-beam computed tomography: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Justin L Ducote; Huanjun Ding; Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jeff Wang; Fumi Kato; Hiroko Yamashita; Motoi Baba; Yi Cui; Ruijiang Li; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.

Authors:  Mireille J M Broeders; Marloes Ten Voorde; Wouter J H Veldkamp; Ruben E van Engen; Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven; Machteld N L 't Jong-Gunneman; Jos de Win; Kitty Droogh-de Greve; Ellen Paap; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The Short-Term Effect of Weight Loss Surgery on Volumetric Breast Density and Fibroglandular Volume.

Authors:  Nasreen A Vohra; Swapnil D Kachare; Paul Vos; Bruce F Schroeder; Olga Schuth; Dylan Suttle; Timothy L Fitzgerald; Jan H Wong; Kathryn M Verbanac
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Common genetic variation and novel loci associated with volumetric mammographic density.

Authors:  Judith S Brand; Keith Humphreys; Jingmei Li; Robert Karlsson; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Technical challenges in generalizing calibration techniques for breast density measurements.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Autumn M Smallwood; Nadia Z Khan; Kaitlyn Kilpatrick; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.

Authors:  Jeff Wang; Ania Azziz; Bo Fan; Serghei Malkov; Catherine Klifa; David Newitt; Silaja Yitta; Nola Hylton; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study.

Authors:  Albert Gubern-Mérida; Michiel Kallenberg; Bram Platel; Ritse M Mann; Robert Martí; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.