Literature DB >> 27832519

Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.

Jeff Wang1,2, Fumi Kato3, Hiroko Yamashita4, Motoi Baba4, Yi Cui2, Ruijiang Li2,5, Noriko Oyama-Manabe2,6, Hiroki Shirato1,2.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer among women and its incidence is increasing. Risk assessment is valuable and recent methods are incorporating novel biomarkers such as mammographic density. Artificial neural networks (ANN) are adaptive algorithms capable of performing pattern-to-pattern learning and are well suited for medical applications. They are potentially useful for calibrating full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for quantitative analysis. This study uses ANN modeling to estimate volumetric breast density (VBD) from FFDM on Japanese women with and without breast cancer. ANN calibration of VBD was performed using phantom data for one FFDM system. Mammograms of 46 Japanese women diagnosed with invasive carcinoma and 53 with negative findings were analyzed using ANN models learned. ANN-estimated VBD was validated against phantom data, compared intra-patient, with qualitative composition scoring, with MRI VBD, and inter-patient with classical risk factors of breast cancer as well as cancer status. Phantom validations reached an R 2 of 0.993. Intra-patient validations ranged from R 2 of 0.789 with VBD to 0.908 with breast volume. ANN VBD agreed well with BI-RADS scoring and MRI VBD with R 2 ranging from 0.665 with VBD to 0.852 with breast volume. VBD was significantly higher in women with cancer. Associations with age, BMI, menopause, and cancer status previously reported were also confirmed. ANN modeling appears to produce reasonable measures of mammographic density validated with phantoms, with existing measures of breast density, and with classical biomarkers of breast cancer. FFDM VBD is significantly higher in Japanese women with cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural networks (ANN); Breast tissue density; Computer analysis; Full-field digital mammography (FFDM); Image processing; Imaging phantoms; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27832519      PMCID: PMC5359207          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9922-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  53 in total

1.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Christian Sohns; Carola Werner; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Amro Masarwah; Päivi Auvinen; Mazen Sudah; Suvi Rautiainen; Anna Sutela; Outi Pelkonen; Sanna Oikari; Veli-Matti Kosma; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Machine learning and radiology.

Authors:  Shijun Wang; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Jeffrey W Hoffmeister; Jocelyn A Rapelyea; Gilat Zisman; Kevin Mohtashemi; Guarav Jindal; Martin P Disimio; Steven K Rogers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  F E Alexander; T J Anderson; H K Brown; A P Forrest; W Hepburn; A E Kirkpatrick; B B Muir; R J Prescott; A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial.

Authors:  K C Chu; C R Smart; R E Tarone
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yasuko Nagao; Yoshihiro Kawaguchi; Yasuyuki Sugiyama; Shietoyo Saji; Yoshitomo Kashiki
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.239

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.

Authors:  Amanda Eng; Zoe Gallant; John Shepherd; Valerie McCormack; Jingmei Li; Mitch Dowsett; Sarah Vinnicombe; Steve Allen; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  An Automatic Parameter Decision System of Bilateral Filtering with GPU-Based Acceleration for Brain MR Images.

Authors:  Herng-Hua Chang; Yu-Ju Lin; Audrey Haihong Zhuang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Detection of Lung Contour with Closed Principal Curve and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Tao Peng; Yihuai Wang; Thomas Canhao Xu; Lianmin Shi; Jianwu Jiang; Shilang Zhu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tuan Wang; Jian-Jun Shuai; Xing Li; Zhi Wen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Blood Test for Breast Cancer Screening through the Detection of Tumor-Associated Circulating Transcripts.

Authors:  Sunyoung Park; Sungwoo Ahn; Jee Ye Kim; Jungho Kim; Hyun Ju Han; Dasom Hwang; Jungmin Park; Hyung Seok Park; Seho Park; Gun Min Kim; Joohyuk Sohn; Joon Jeong; Yong Uk Song; Hyeyoung Lee; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.