OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate alterations in flow patterns in thoracic aortic dissections using 4-dimensional, flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at 2 academic tertiary referral medical centers. Thirteen 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging studies were performed in 12 subjects (4 female, aged 25-71 years) with thoracic aortic dissection using 3.0T clinical scanners. Qualitative assessment of flow patterns in the true and false lumina was performed in consensus by 3 cardiovascular radiologists. Quantitative analysis included measurement of net flow, retrograde flow, peak flow, and time-to-peak flow in the true and false lumina in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. Differences in flow through the true and false lumina at each analysis plane were compared with the 2-tailed, paired Student t test. RESULTS: Flow patterns were significantly altered in association with different extents of disease, vessel dilatation, and post-therapeutic anatomy. Total flow per cardiac cycle and peak flow were higher in the true lumen than in the false lumen (P < .01). Retrograde flow was less in the true lumen than in the false lumen (P ≤ .01). Time-to-peak flow in the true lumen occurred later than in the false lumen (P = .05-.08). CONCLUSIONS: Four-dimensional, flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T provided qualitative and quantitative information on alterations of aortic flow in patients with thoracic aortic dissection. Future application of this magnetic resonance flow methodology may help provide insights into the pathophysiology and effects of flow alterations and establish prognostic indicators for the development of complications or aneurysm growth in patients with aortic dissection.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate alterations in flow patterns in thoracic aortic dissections using 4-dimensional, flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at 2 academic tertiary referral medical centers. Thirteen 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging studies were performed in 12 subjects (4 female, aged 25-71 years) with thoracic aortic dissection using 3.0T clinical scanners. Qualitative assessment of flow patterns in the true and false lumina was performed in consensus by 3 cardiovascular radiologists. Quantitative analysis included measurement of net flow, retrograde flow, peak flow, and time-to-peak flow in the true and false lumina in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. Differences in flow through the true and false lumina at each analysis plane were compared with the 2-tailed, paired Student t test. RESULTS: Flow patterns were significantly altered in association with different extents of disease, vessel dilatation, and post-therapeutic anatomy. Total flow per cardiac cycle and peak flow were higher in the true lumen than in the false lumen (P < .01). Retrograde flow was less in the true lumen than in the false lumen (P ≤ .01). Time-to-peak flow in the true lumen occurred later than in the false lumen (P = .05-.08). CONCLUSIONS: Four-dimensional, flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T provided qualitative and quantitative information on alterations of aortic flow in patients with thoracic aortic dissection. Future application of this magnetic resonance flow methodology may help provide insights into the pathophysiology and effects of flow alterations and establish prognostic indicators for the development of complications or aneurysm growth in patients with aortic dissection.
Authors: Toru Suzuki; Rajendra H Mehta; Hüseyin Ince; Ryozo Nagai; Yasunari Sakomura; Frank Weber; Tetsuya Sumiyoshi; Eduardo Bossone; Santi Trimarchi; Jeanna V Cooper; Dean E Smith; Eric M Isselbacher; Kim A Eagle; Christoph A Nienaber Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H G Bogren; S R Underwood; D N Firmin; R H Mohiaddin; R H Klipstein; R S Rees; D B Longmore Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 1988-06 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: James L Januzzi; Firas Marayati; Rajendra H Mehta; Jeanna V Cooper; Patrick T O'Gara; Udo Sechtem; Eduardo Bossone; Arturo Evangelista; Jae K Oh; Christoph A Nienaber; Kim A Eagle; Eric M Isselbacher Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: J Stewart Collins; Arturo Evangelista; Christoph A Nienaber; Eduardo Bossone; Jianming Fang; Jeanna V Cooper; Dean E Smith; Patrick T O'Gara; Truls Myrmel; Dan Gilon; Eric M Isselbacher; Marc Penn; Linda A Pape; Kim A Eagle; Rajendra H Mehta Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-09-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Kelly Jarvis; Judith T Pruijssen; Andre Y Son; Bradley D Allen; Gilles Soulat; Alireza Vali; Alex J Barker; Andrew W Hoel; Mark K Eskandari; S Chris Malaisrie; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Bradley D Allen; Pascal J Aouad; Nicholas S Burris; Amir Ali Rahsepar; Kelly B Jarvis; Christopher J Francois; Alex J Barker; S Chris Malaisrie; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-04-25
Authors: David Marlevi; Julio A Sotelo; Ross Grogan-Kaylor; Yunus Ahmed; Sergio Uribe; Himanshu J Patel; Elazer R Edelman; David A Nordsletten; Nicholas S Burris Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Paula A Rudenick; Bart H Bijnens; Patrick Segers; David García-Dorado; Arturo Evangelista Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240