Michael Markl1, Wolf Wallis, Andreas Harloff. 1. Department of Radiology - Medical Physics, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany. michael.markl@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the scan-rescan reproducibility and observer variability of flow-sensitive four-dimensional (4D) MRI in the aorta for the assessment of blood flow and global and segmental wall shear stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ECG and respiration-synchronized flow-sensitive 4D MRI data (spatio-temporal resolution = 1.7 × 2.0 × 2.2 mm(3) /40.8 ms) were acquired in 12 healthy volunteers. To analyze scan-rescan variability, flow-sensitive 4D MRI was repeated in 10 volunteers during a second visit. Data analysis included calculation of time-resolved and total flow, peak systolic velocity, and regional and global wall shear stress (WSS) in up to 24 analysis planes distributed along the aorta. RESULTS: Scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer agreement was excellent for the calculation of total flow and peak systolic velocity (mean differences <5% of the average flow parameter). Global WSS demonstrated moderate agreement and increased variability regarding wall shear stress (scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer agreement; mean differences <10% of the average WSS parameters). The segmental distribution of wall shear stress in the thoracic aorta could reliably be reproduced (r > 0.87; P < 0.001) for different observers and examinations. CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive 4D MRI-based analysis of aortic blood flow can be performed with good reproducibility. Robustness of global and regional WSS quantification was limited, but spatio-temporal WSS distributions could reliably be replicated.
PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the scan-rescan reproducibility and observer variability of flow-sensitive four-dimensional (4D) MRI in the aorta for the assessment of blood flow and global and segmental wall shear stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ECG and respiration-synchronized flow-sensitive 4D MRI data (spatio-temporal resolution = 1.7 × 2.0 × 2.2 mm(3) /40.8 ms) were acquired in 12 healthy volunteers. To analyze scan-rescan variability, flow-sensitive 4D MRI was repeated in 10 volunteers during a second visit. Data analysis included calculation of time-resolved and total flow, peak systolic velocity, and regional and global wall shear stress (WSS) in up to 24 analysis planes distributed along the aorta. RESULTS: Scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer agreement was excellent for the calculation of total flow and peak systolic velocity (mean differences <5% of the average flow parameter). Global WSS demonstrated moderate agreement and increased variability regarding wall shear stress (scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer agreement; mean differences <10% of the average WSS parameters). The segmental distribution of wall shear stress in the thoracic aorta could reliably be reproduced (r > 0.87; P < 0.001) for different observers and examinations. CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive 4D MRI-based analysis of aortic blood flow can be performed with good reproducibility. Robustness of global and regional WSS quantification was limited, but spatio-temporal WSS distributions could reliably be replicated.
Authors: Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Sasan Partovi; Philipp Geisbüsch; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Aart J Nederveen; Bradley D Allen; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Joachim Eichhorn; Yoo-Jin Azad; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Qiong Huang; Xingbin Hu; Wanming He; Yang Zhao; Shihui Hao; Qijing Wu; Shaowei Li; Shuyi Zhang; Min Shi Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Christopher J François; Michael Markl; Mark L Schiebler; Eric Niespodzany; Benjamin R Landgraf; Christian Schlensak; Alex Frydrychowicz Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 5.209