Literature DB >> 21448968

Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI.

Michael Markl1, Wolf Wallis, Andreas Harloff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the scan-rescan reproducibility and observer variability of flow-sensitive four-dimensional (4D) MRI in the aorta for the assessment of blood flow and global and segmental wall shear stress.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ECG and respiration-synchronized flow-sensitive 4D MRI data (spatio-temporal resolution = 1.7 × 2.0 × 2.2 mm(3) /40.8 ms) were acquired in 12 healthy volunteers. To analyze scan-rescan variability, flow-sensitive 4D MRI was repeated in 10 volunteers during a second visit. Data analysis included calculation of time-resolved and total flow, peak systolic velocity, and regional and global wall shear stress (WSS) in up to 24 analysis planes distributed along the aorta.
RESULTS: Scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer agreement was excellent for the calculation of total flow and peak systolic velocity (mean differences <5% of the average flow parameter). Global WSS demonstrated moderate agreement and increased variability regarding wall shear stress (scan-rescan, inter-observer, and intra-observer agreement; mean differences <10% of the average WSS parameters). The segmental distribution of wall shear stress in the thoracic aorta could reliably be reproduced (r > 0.87; P < 0.001) for different observers and examinations.
CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive 4D MRI-based analysis of aortic blood flow can be performed with good reproducibility. Robustness of global and regional WSS quantification was limited, but spatio-temporal WSS distributions could reliably be replicated.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21448968     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  61 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro validation of aortic flow quantification by time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded MRI.

Authors:  Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Sasan Partovi; Philipp Geisbüsch; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Wall shear stress distribution at the carotid bifurcation: influence of eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  A Harloff; S Berg; A J Barker; J Schöllhorn; M Schumacher; C Weiller; M Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A methodology to detect abnormal relative wall shear stress on the full surface of the thoracic aorta using four-dimensional flow MRI.

Authors:  Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Aart J Nederveen; Bradley D Allen; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Emerging techniques for evaluation of the hemodynamics of intracranial vascular pathology.

Authors:  Warren Chang; Melissa Huang; Aichi Chien
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-02

6.  Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Joachim Eichhorn; Yoo-Jin Azad; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Fluid shear stress and tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Qiong Huang; Xingbin Hu; Wanming He; Yang Zhao; Shihui Hao; Qijing Wu; Shaowei Li; Shuyi Zhang; Min Shi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly Jarvis; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-12-09

9.  Four-dimensional, flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow patterns in thoracic aortic dissections.

Authors:  Christopher J François; Michael Markl; Mark L Schiebler; Eric Niespodzany; Benjamin R Landgraf; Christian Schlensak; Alex Frydrychowicz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging 4-D flow-based analysis of aortic hemodynamics in Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Raoul Arnold; Marie Neu; Daniel Hirtler; Charlotte Gimpel; Michael Markl; Julia Geiger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.