Literature DB >> 24276313

Haptic guidance interferes with learning to make movements at an angle to stimulus direction.

Herbert Heuer1, Katrin Rapp.   

Abstract

Haptic guidance has been shown to interfere with learning a novel visuo-motor rotation. Here, we ask whether this interference is specific to the learning of visuo-motor transformations or whether it is a more generalized phenomenon of learning spatial movement characteristics. Participants practiced to make movements at an angle of 75° relative to target directions with and without haptic path guidance. Test trials without guidance and without visual feedback revealed poorer performance after haptic guidance practice than in the no-guidance control group, even though during guided practice movement directions were more accurate than during unguided practice. The more precise directions during guided practice were associated with shorter movement latencies than in the control group, suggesting an incomplete rotation of the movement direction relative to the direction of the visual target. A detailed analysis of the first few millimeters of each movement revealed that the initial movement direction was indeed rotated too little, and the correct direction was adopted only gradually under the influence of haptic guidance. These findings support the perspective on motor learning as a process that is driven by consequent improvements of performance and that is compromised by factors that serve to improve performance even without learning. Haptic guidance is one such factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24276313     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3775-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The learning of 90° continuous relative phase with and without Lissajous feedback: external and internally generated bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-01-08

3.  Implicit and explicit adjustments to extrinsic visuo-motor transformations and their age-related changes.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Direct evidence for cortical suppression of somatosensory afferents during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Bernier; Borís Burle; Franck Vidal; Thierry Hasbroucq; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Proprioception plays a different role for sensorimotor adaptation to different distortions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Monika Thomas
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.

Authors:  Jenna Lüttgen; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  The influence of haptic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns.

Authors:  Jenna Lüttgen; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Specificity of practice: interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback.

Authors:  Yannick Blandin; Lucette Toussaint; Charles H Shea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Jenna Lüttgen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Haptic Guidance Needs to Be Intuitive Not Just Informative to Improve Human Motor Accuracy.

Authors:  Winfred Mugge; Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Robot-Assisted Proprioceptive Training with Added Vibro-Tactile Feedback Enhances Somatosensory and Motor Performance.

Authors:  Anna Vera Cuppone; Valentina Squeri; Marianna Semprini; Lorenzo Masia; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Integrating force and position: testing model predictions.

Authors:  Femke E van Beek; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Astrid M L Kappers; Gabriel Baud-Bovy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.