Literature DB >> 21840075

The influence of haptic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns.

Jenna Lüttgen1, Herbert Heuer.   

Abstract

Haptic guidance by a robot is a recent technology to support motor learning. Its mechanisms and effects are not yet well understood. One of the hypotheses is that learning of temporal characteristics is particularly susceptible to the beneficial effects of robotic guidance. In this study we investigate the influence of robotic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns. Participants practiced to draw circles with the velocity profile of ellipses. Performance during the practice phase, when participants were assisted by a robotic device, as well as during the test phase, when assistance was switched off, was compared to a control group. During practice participants with robotic assistance performed better on all three dependent measures, shape, timing of the velocity modulation, and modulation amplitude. However, these differences between groups largely disappeared in the test phase. Only the difference in the amplitude of the velocity modulation remained, which was more accurate in the robot-guidance group than in the control group. This remaining difference likely results from a secondary effect of robotic guidance, namely the experience of smaller visual errors and weaker velocity modulations during practice.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840075     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  7 in total

1.  Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Haptic guidance interferes with learning to make movements at an angle to stimulus direction.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.

Authors:  Jenna Lüttgen; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Jenna Lüttgen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of robotically modulating kinematic variability on motor skill learning and motivation.

Authors:  Jaime E Duarte; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Active versus passive training of a complex bimanual task: is prescriptive proprioceptive information sufficient for inducing motor learning?

Authors:  Iseult A M Beets; Marc Macé; Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; Oron Levin; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.