Literature DB >> 22830748

Evaluation of the potential utility of flat panel CT for quantifying relative contrast enhancement.

A Kyle Jones1, Armeen Mahvash.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Certain directed oncologic therapies seek to take advantage of the fact that tumors are typically more susceptible to directed therapeutic agents than normal tissue owing to their extensive networks of poorly formed, leaky vasculature. If differences between the vascularity of normal and tumor tissues could be quantified, patients could be selected for or excluded from directed treatments on the basis of this difference. However, angiographic imaging techniques such as digital subtraction angiography (DSA) yield two-dimensional data that may be inadequate for this task. As a first step, the authors evaluated the feasibility of using a commercial implementation of flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) to quantify differences in enhancement of a simulated tumor compared with normal tissue based on differences in CT number measured in precontrast and postcontrast scans.
METHODS: To evaluate the FPCT scanner studied, the authors scanned several phantoms containing simulated normal and tumor tissues. In the first experiment, the authors used an anthropomorphic phantom containing inclusions representing normal, tumor, and bone tissue to evaluate the constancy of CT numbers in scans repeated at clinically relevant intervals of 1 and 3 min. The authors then scanned gelatin phantoms containing dilutions of iodinated contrast to evaluate the accuracy of relative contrast enhancement measurements for a clinical FPCT system. Data were analyzed using widely available software.
RESULTS: CT numbers measured in identical locations were constant over both scan intervals evaluated. Measured relative contrast enhancement values were accurate compared with known relative contrast enhancement values. Care must be taken to avoid artifacts in reconstructed images when placing regions of interest.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limitations, FPCT in the interventional laboratory can be used to quantify relative contrast enhancement in phantoms. This is accomplished by measuring CT number in simulated tumor and normal tissue on precontrast and postcontrast scans. This information opens the door for refinement of technique in an effort to use such a technique to plan directed therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22830748      PMCID: PMC3390050          DOI: 10.1118/1.4725711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: effects of image lag.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of C-arm CT on hepatic arterial interventions for hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Michael J Wallace; Ravi Murthy; Paresh P Kamat; Teri Moore; Sujaya H Rao; Joe Ensor; Sanjay Gupta; Kamran Ahrar; David C Madoff; Stephen E McRae; Marshall E Hicks
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality.

Authors:  N Mail; D J Moseley; J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  C-arm CT measurement of cerebral blood volume: an experimental study in canines.

Authors:  A S Ahmed; M Zellerhoff; C M Strother; K A Pulfer; T Redel; Y Deuerling-Zheng; K Royalty; D Consigny; D B Niemann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  A quality assurance program for image quality of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Douglas J Moseley; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Joan Hatton; Boyd McCurdy; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: multivariate analysis of predicting factors for tumor response and survival in a 362-patient cohort.

Authors:  Hong Tao Hu; Jin Hyoung Kim; Lim-Sick Lee; Kyung-Ah Kim; Gi-Young Ko; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Kyu-Bo Sung; Dong Il Gwon; Ji Hoon Shin; Ho-Young Song
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Variations in cone beam CT numbers as a function of patient size: in vivo demonstration in bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Ajit Mullen; Tomas Kron; Jessica Thomas; Farshad Foroudi
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.735

10.  Incorporating cone-beam CT into the treatment planning for yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Authors:  John D Louie; Nishita Kothary; William T Kuo; Gloria L Hwang; Lawrence V Hofmann; Michael L Goris; Andrei H Iagaru; Daniel Y Sze
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can radiomics features be reproducibly measured from CBCT images for patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Xenia Fave; Dennis Mackin; Jinzhong Yang; Joy Zhang; David Fried; Peter Balter; David Followill; Daniel Gomez; A Kyle Jones; Francesco Stingo; Jonas Fontenot; Laurence Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.