Literature DB >> 3105724

Are isolated maternity units run by general practitioners dangerous?

G Young.   

Abstract

A retrospective survey was carried out of women admitted in labour to an isolated maternity unit run by general practitioners in Penrith. In the five years 1980-4, 1267 women began labour in Penrith, of whom 1153 (91%) never required help from a consultant unit. Ninety required transfer during labour. Ten mothers and four neonates required transfer during the early puerperium, all to one receiving unit in Carlisle. There were six perinatal deaths during the five years; five occurred in babies delivered after transfer. The perinatal mortality was 4.7/1000. The low mortality, the low level of intervention, and the preference of women all support the retention of isolated units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3105724      PMCID: PMC1245803          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6574.744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  6 in total

1.  Maternity services: the consumer's view.

Authors:  A Taylor
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-04

2.  Obstetric hospitals and general-practitioner maternity units--the statistical record.

Authors:  M Tew
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1977-11

3.  General practitioner obstetrics in the Northern region in 1983.

Authors:  G N Marsh; H A Cashman; I T Russell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-23

4.  Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  A J Cavenagh; K M Phillips; B Sheridan; E M Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

5.  The economics of specialist and general practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  A M Gray; R Steele
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1981-10

6.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02
  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Attitudes of professionals in providing maternity care in a primary health care system in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  A N al-Nasser; M A al-Sekait; W A Khan; E A Bamgboye
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-02

2.  Choice and chance in low risk maternity care.

Authors:  R Campbell; A Macfarlane; S Cavenagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

3.  General practice and the future of obstetric care.

Authors:  G L Young
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  General practitioners and obstetrics: a brief history.

Authors:  Irvine Loudon
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Reading lists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-09

6.  Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988.

Authors:  L F Smith; D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

7.  Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group.

Authors:  J Davies; E Hey; W Reid; G Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

8.  General practitioner obstetrics.

Authors:  D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-18

9.  Outcome of women booked into an isolated general practice maternity unit over eight years.

Authors:  T Garrett; W House; S W Lowe
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-11

10.  Outcome of pregnancies referred to a general practitioner maternity unit in a district hospital.

Authors:  A Prentice; S M Walton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.