OBJECTIVE: To examine information flow, a vital component of a patient's care and outcomes, in a sample of multiple hospital nursing units to uncover potential sources of error and opportunities for systematic improvement. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study of a sample of eight medical-surgical nursing units from four diverse hospitals in one US state. We conducted direct work observations of nursing staff's communication patterns for entire shifts (8 or 12 h) for a total of 200 h and gathered related documentation artifacts for analyses. Data were coded using qualitative content analysis procedures and then synthesized and organized thematically to characterize current practices. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the analyses, which represent serious vulnerabilities in the flow of patient care information during nurse hand-offs and to the entire interdisciplinary team across time and settings. The three themes are: (1) variation in nurse documentation and communication; (2) the absence of a centralized care overview in the patient's electronic health record, ie, easily accessible by the entire care team; and (3) rarity of interdisciplinary communication. CONCLUSION: The care information flow vulnerabilities are a catalyst for multiple types of serious and undetectable clinical errors. We have two major recommendations to address the gaps: (1) to standardize the format, content, and words used to document core information, such as the plan of care, and make this easily accessible to all team members; (2) to conduct extensive usability testing to ensure that tools in the electronic health record help the disconnected interdisciplinary team members to maintain a shared understanding of the patient's plan.
OBJECTIVE: To examine information flow, a vital component of a patient's care and outcomes, in a sample of multiple hospital nursing units to uncover potential sources of error and opportunities for systematic improvement. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study of a sample of eight medical-surgical nursing units from four diverse hospitals in one US state. We conducted direct work observations of nursing staff's communication patterns for entire shifts (8 or 12 h) for a total of 200 h and gathered related documentation artifacts for analyses. Data were coded using qualitative content analysis procedures and then synthesized and organized thematically to characterize current practices. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the analyses, which represent serious vulnerabilities in the flow of patient care information during nurse hand-offs and to the entire interdisciplinary team across time and settings. The three themes are: (1) variation in nurse documentation and communication; (2) the absence of a centralized care overview in the patient's electronic health record, ie, easily accessible by the entire care team; and (3) rarity of interdisciplinary communication. CONCLUSION: The care information flow vulnerabilities are a catalyst for multiple types of serious and undetectable clinical errors. We have two major recommendations to address the gaps: (1) to standardize the format, content, and words used to document core information, such as the plan of care, and make this easily accessible to all team members; (2) to conduct extensive usability testing to ensure that tools in the electronic health record help the disconnected interdisciplinary team members to maintain a shared understanding of the patient's plan.
Authors: Tosha B Wetterneck; Kathleen A Skibinski; Tanita L Roberts; Susan M Kleppin; Mark E Schroeder; Myra Enloe; Steven S Rough; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Pascale Carayon Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: S Trent Rosenbloom; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu; Nancy Lorenzi; William W Stead; Kevin B Johnson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Gail M Keenan; Karen Dunn Lopez; Vanessa E C Sousa; Janet Stifter; Tamara G R Macieira; Andrew D Boyd; Yingwei Yao; T Heather Herdman; Sue Moorhead; Anna McDaniel; Diana J Wilkie Journal: Int J Nurs Knowl Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 1.222
Authors: Stephanie Witzman; Shavonne L Massey; Sudha Kessler; Ernesto Gonzalez-Giraldo; Sara E Fridinger; Lila Worden; Naomi Lewin; Dennis Dlugos; Susan Melamed; Mark Fitzgerald; France W Fung; Marissa Ferruzi; Nicole McNamee; Denise LaFalce; Maureen Donnelly; Amber Haywood; Linda Allen-Napoli; Brenda Banwell; Nicholas S Abend Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.590