Literature DB >> 24825472

The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: which markers matter and how should they be used?

Marianne Schmid1, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Markus Graefen, Margit Fisch, Felix K Chun, Jens Hansen.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) screening has been substantially influenced by the clinical implementation of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In this context, improvement of early PCa detection and stage migration as well as reduced PCa mortality were achieved, and up-to-date PSA represents the gold standard biomarker of PCa diagnosis together with clinical findings. Nonetheless, PSA shows weakness in discriminating between malign and benign prostatic disease or indolent and aggressive cancers. As a result, the expansion of PSA screening is extensively debated with regard to overdetection and ultimately overtreatment, keeping in mind that PCa is still the third leading cause of cancer-specific mortality in the Western male population. Consequently, today's task is to increase the accuracy of PCa detection and furthermore to allow stratification for indolent PCa that might permit active surveillance and to filter out aggressive cancers necessitating treatment. Thus, novel biomarkers, especially in combination with approved clinical risk factors (e.g., age or family history of PCa), within multivariable prediction models carry the potential to improve many aspects of PCa diagnosis and to enable risk classification in clinical practice. Multivariable models lead to superior accuracy for PCa prediction instead of the use of a single risk factor. The aim of this article was to present an overview of known risk factors for PCa together with new promising blood- and urine-based biomarkers and their application within risk models that may allow risk stratification for PCa prior to prostate biopsy. Risk models may optimize PCa detection and classification with regard to improved PCa risk assessment and avoidance of unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825472     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1317-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  97 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the PCA3 assay in guiding initial biopsy decisions.

Authors:  Alexandre de la Taille; Jacques Irani; Markus Graefen; Felix Chun; Theo de Reijke; Paul Kil; Paolo Gontero; Alain Mottaz; Alexander Haese
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Genetic analysis of the principal genes related to prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Maria Jesus Alvarez-Cubero; Maria Saiz; Luis Javier Martinez-Gonzalez; Juan Carlos Alvarez; Jose Antonio Lorente; Jose Manuel Cozar
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Prediction of the risk of harboring prostate cancer by a prebiopsy nomogram based on extended biopsy protocol.

Authors:  Nathalie Nicolaiew; Guillaume Ploussard; Felix K-H Chun; Evanguelos Xylinas; Yves Allory; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based study.

Authors:  Limin X Clegg; Frederick P Li; Benjamin F Hankey; Kenneth Chu; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-23

5.  Cancer-associated changes in the expression of TMPRSS2-ERG, PCA3, and SPINK1 in histologically benign tissue from cancerous vs noncancerous prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Riina-Minna Väänänen; Hans Lilja; Leni Kauko; Pauliina Helo; Henna Kekki; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; Martti Nurmi; Kalle Alanen; Anders Bjartell; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Development and internal validation of a Prostate Health Index based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer at extended biopsy.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Alessandro Larcher; Giuliana Lista; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea Cestari; Nicoló Maria Buffi; Vittorio Bini; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion predicts subsequent detection of prostate cancer in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Kyung Park; James T Dalton; Ramesh Narayanan; Christopher E Barbieri; Michael L Hancock; David G Bostwick; Mitchell S Steiner; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Predicting prostate cancer risk through incorporation of prostate cancer gene 3.

Authors:  Donna Pauler Ankerst; Jack Groskopf; John R Day; Amy Blase; Harry Rittenhouse; Brad H Pollock; Cathy Tangen; Dipen Parekh; Robin J Leach; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling.

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer: an early molecular event associated with invasion.

Authors:  Sven Perner; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Francesca Demichelis; Matthias D Hofer; Pamela L Paris; Jeff Simko; Colin Collins; Tarek A Bismar; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Angelo M De Marzo; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of men's risk thresholds to proceed with prostate biopsy for the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Koo; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  A critical appraisal of biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vikram M Narayan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Proteolyzed Variant of IgG with Free C-Terminal Lysine as a Biomarker of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Lokshin; Lyudmila M Mikhaleva; Eugene I Goufman; Marina N Boltovskaya; Natalia B Tikhonova; Irina I Stepanova; Alexandr A Stepanov; Natalia V Potoldykova; Andrey Z Vinarov; Paul Stemmer; Vasily Iakovlev
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-23

4.  Prostate tumor attenuation in the nu/nu murine model due to anti-sarcosine antibodies in folate-targeted liposomes.

Authors:  Zbynek Heger; Hana Polanska; Miguel Angel Merlos Rodrigo; Roman Guran; Pavel Kulich; Pavel Kopel; Michal Masarik; Tomas Eckschlager; Marie Stiborova; Rene Kizek; Vojtech Adam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparative Study of Blood-Based Biomarkers, α2,3-Sialic Acid PSA and PHI, for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer-Batallé; Esther Llop; Manel Ramírez; Rosa Núria Aleixandre; Marc Saez; Josep Comet; Rafael de Llorens; Rosa Peracaula
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Sniffing out prostate cancer: a new clinical opportunity.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Lorenzo Tidu; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-10-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.