Literature DB >> 22819523

In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive-diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: impact of tilt and decentration.

Robert Montés-Micó1, Norberto López-Gil, Cari Pérez-Vives, Sergio Bonaque, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optical quality of Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 refractive-diffractive +3.00 D and Lentis Mplus LS-312 nonrotational symmetric +3.00 D aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and analyze the effect of tilt and decentration.
SETTING: University of Valencia, Valencia, and University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: An artificial model eye was used to measure wavefront aberrations of both IOL models. The modulation transfer function (MTF) and point-spread function (PSF) were calculated for a 5.0 mm pupil and under 5 situations: centered, 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm decentered, and 2 degrees and 4 degrees tilted.
RESULTS: The refractive-diffractive IOL had the highest MTF values at all spatial frequencies. Similarly, the PSF was worse for the refractive-diffractive IOL. The MTFs for the refractive-diffractive IOL decreased when the IOL was decentered or tilted, being more robust for tilting than decentration. The MTFs for the nonrotational symmetric IOL were similar under all testing conditions. Cutoff frequencies for the refractive-diffractive IOL were stable over the range of tilting studied and comparable with the cutoff when the IOL was centered (approximately 50 cycles per degree [cpd]). When the IOL was decentered, the cutoff frequency decreased by approximately 40 cpd. The nonrotational symmetric IOL cutoff frequencies for misalignment and tilt were low (approximately 30 cpd) and similar under all conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The refractive-diffractive IOL provided better optical quality than the nonrotational symmetric IOL. Tilt and decentration had a significant impact on optical quality with both IOLs, being more severe with the nonrotational symmetric IOL.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819523     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  16 in total

1.  In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Presbyopic lens exchange (PRELEX) cataract surgery outcomes with implantation of a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens: femtosecond laser-assisted versus manual phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Peter Žiak; Juraj Halička; Peter Mojžiš; Karolína Kapitánová; Javorka Michal; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  In vitro optical performance of a new aberration-free intraocular lens.

Authors:  D Madrid-Costa; J Ruiz-Alcocer; T Ferrer-Blasco; S García-Lázaro; R Montés-Micó
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Bilateral implantation of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens in children above 5 years of age.

Authors:  Jagat Ram; Aniruddha Agarwal; Jaidrath Kumar; Adit Gupta
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of long-term decentration and tilt in two types of multifocal intraocular lenses with OPD-Scan III aberrometer.

Authors:  Wenwen He; Xiaodi Qiu; Shaohua Zhang; Yu Du; Yinglei Zhang; Yi Lu; Xiangjia Zhu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Model of the light sword intraocular lens: in-vitro comparative studies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Petelczyc; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk; Narcyz Błocki; Anna Byszewska; Zbigniew Jaroszewicz; Karol Kakarenko; Katarzyna Kołacz; Michał Miler; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; Walter Torres-Sepúlveda; Marek Rękas
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Opto-Mechanical Eye Models, a Review on Human Vision Applications and Perspectives for Use in Industry.

Authors:  André Rino Amorim; Boris Bret; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tong Sun; Yiyun Liu; Yufei Gao; Chuhao Tang; Qianqian Lan; Tingting Yang; Xiaorui Zhao; Hong Qi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 9.  Optimizing outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Gitansha Shreyas Sachdev; Mahipal Sachdev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Shinwook Lee; Myoung Choi; Zaiwei Xu; Zeyu Zhao; Elsinore Alexander; Yueai Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.