Literature DB >> 22818414

Comparison of the effects of high-energy photon beam irradiation (10 and 18 MV) on 2 types of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Haruko Hashii1, Takayuki Hashimoto, Ayako Okawa, Koichi Shida, Tomonori Isobe, Masahiro Hanmura, Tetsuo Nishimura, Kazutaka Aonuma, Takeji Sakae, Hideyuki Sakurai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy for cancer may be required for patients with implantable cardiac devices. However, the influence of secondary neutrons or scattered irradiation from high-energy photons (≥10 MV) on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is unclear. This study was performed to examine this issue in 2 ICD models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ICDs were positioned around a water phantom under conditions simulating clinical radiation therapy. The ICDs were not irradiated directly. A control ICD was positioned 140 cm from the irradiation isocenter. Fractional irradiation was performed with 18-MV and 10-MV photon beams to give cumulative in-field doses of 600 Gy and 1600 Gy, respectively. Errors were checked after each fraction. Soft errors were defined as severe (change to safety back-up mode), moderate (memory interference, no changes in device parameters), and minor (slight memory change, undetectable by computer).
RESULTS: Hard errors were not observed. For the older ICD model, the incidences of severe, moderate, and minor soft errors at 18 MV were 0.75, 0.5, and 0.83/50 Gy at the isocenter. The corresponding data for 10 MV were 0.094, 0.063, and 0 /50 Gy. For the newer ICD model at 18 MV, these data were 0.083, 2.3, and 5.8 /50 Gy. Moderate and minor errors occurred at 18 MV in control ICDs placed 140 cm from the isocenter. The error incidences were 0, 1, and 0 /600 Gy at the isocenter for the newer model, and 0, 1, and 6 /600Gy for the older model. At 10 MV, no errors occurred in control ICDs.
CONCLUSIONS: ICD errors occurred more frequently at 18 MV irradiation, which suggests that the errors were mainly caused by secondary neutrons. Soft errors of ICDs were observed with high energy photon beams, but most were not critical in the newer model. These errors may occur even when the device is far from the irradiation field.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22818414     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  Effect of X-ray dose rates higher than 8 Gy/min on the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Nakamura; Takahiro Aoyama; Naoki Kaneda; Masashi Otsuji; Yoshitaka Minami; Ami Sakuragi; Masaru Nakamura
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Malfunctions of implantable cardiac devices in patients receiving proton beam therapy: incidence and predictors.

Authors:  Daniel R Gomez; Falk Poenisch; Chelsea C Pinnix; Tommy Sheu; Joe Y Chang; Nada Memon; Radhe Mohan; Marc A Rozner; Anne H Dougherty
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  DEGRO/DGK guideline for radiotherapy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Benjamin Gauter-Fleckenstein; Carsten W Israel; Marc Dorenkamp; Jürgen Dunst; Mattias Roser; Rainer Schimpf; Volker Steil; Jörg Schäfer; Ulrike Höller; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Radiotherapy of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline-is the risk of relevant errors overestimated?

Authors:  Felix Steger; Matthias G Hautmann; Christoph Süß; Ute Hubauer; Ekrem Ücer; Lars Maier; Oliver Kölbl; Carsten Jungbauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  A clinical example of extreme dose exposure for an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator : Beyond the DEGRO guidelines.

Authors:  Yoana Hristova; Janett Köhn; Stefanie Preuß; Claus Rödel; Panagiotis Balermpas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Management of radiation therapy patients with cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker.

Authors:  Francesca Salerno; Sara Gomellini; Cristina Caruso; Raffaele Barbara; Daniela Musio; Tamara Coppi; Mario Cardinale; Vincenzo Tombolini; Ugo de Paula
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Local dose rate effects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with flattening filter free and flattened photon radiation.

Authors:  Benjamin Gauter-Fleckenstein; Erol Tülümen; Boris Rudic; Martin Borggrefe; Martin Polednik; Jens Fleckenstein
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A case of radiotherapy for an advanced bronchial carcinoma patient with implanted cardiac rhythm machines as well as heart assist device.

Authors:  Sergiu Scobioala; Iris Ernst; Christos Moustakis; Uwe Haverkamp; Sven Martens; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: a new comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands. Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO).

Authors:  Coen W Hurkmans; Joost L Knegjens; Bing S Oei; Ad J J Maas; G J Uiterwaal; Arnoud J van der Borden; Marleen M J Ploegmakers; Lieselot van Erven
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Influence of Ionizing Radiation on Two Generations of Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nicolas Guevara; Anaïs Gérard; Jeanne Dupré; Delphine Goursonnet; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Gaëlle Angellier; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.