Literature DB >> 22817786

Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle.

Shyam Varadarajulu1, Ji Young Bang, Shantel Hebert-Magee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A needle made of nitinol has been developed with enhanced flexibility to overcome the limitations of the currently available 19-G EUS-FNA needles.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the ability to perform transduodenal FNAs, procure histologic specimens, and undertake therapeutic interventions using the flexible 19-G needle.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with subepithelial masses, pancreatic head or uncinate lesions, or lesions adjacent to the pancreatic head, and patients undergoing therapeutic intervention.
INTERVENTIONS: Perform tissue acquisition and interventions with the flexible 19-G FNA needle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluate the ability to perform transduodenal passes with the flexible 19-G FNA needle. Also, assess the utility of the needle to yield both cytologic and histologic samples and to perform therapeutic interventions.
RESULTS: Of the 50 patients enrolled, tissue acquisition was undertaken in 38 and therapeutic intervention in 12. Of 38 patients from whom tissue was procured, 32 tissue samples were from pancreatic head/uncinate or peripancreatic masses and 6 were from subepithelial masses. Tissue acquisition, which included transduodenal passes, was successful and adequate for cytologic assessment in all 38 patients (100%). Satisfactory histologic specimens were procured from 36 of 38 (94.7%) patients. An onsite diagnosis was established in 35 of 38 (92.1%) patients. In 3 patients with indeterminate/suspicious lesions, a definitive diagnosis was established at histology. A mean of 1.45 ± 0.79 passes per patient was performed. All 12 therapeutic interventions were successful (100%) and included pseudocyst drainage in 5, pelvic abscess drainage in 2, fiducial placement in 2, celiac plexus neurolysis in 2, and cholangiogram in 1. Needle dysfunction or procedural complications were not encountered. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study with limited power.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that the flexible 19-G needle can be used for procuring cytologic aspirates and histologic specimens and to undertake therapeutic interventions even by the transduodenal route. Confirmatory studies are required in a larger cohort of patients with varied pathologic conditions to validate these findings.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22817786     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  45 in total

1.  Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Abdullah Alatawi; Frédéric Beuvon; Sophie Grabar; Sarah Leblanc; Stanislas Chaussade; Benoit Terris; Maximilien Barret; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration and useful ancillary methods.

Authors:  Mario Tadic; Tajana Stoos-Veic; Rajko Kusec
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Applications of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Leticia Perondi Luz; Mohammad Ali Al-Haddad; Michael Sai Lai Sey; John M DeWitt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Fabbri; Carmelo Luigiano; Andrea Lisotti; Vincenzo Cennamo; Clara Virgilio; Giancarlo Caletti; Pietro Fusaroli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?

Authors:  Zeid Karadsheh; Mohammad Al-Haddad
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Tissue diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumor only through Trucut biopsy under a forward-viewing endoscope: applicability as newer diagnostic modality.

Authors:  Weon Jin Ko; Ga Won Song; Ki Baik Hahm; Sung Pyo Hong; Joo Young Cho; Jun-Hyung Cho; So Young Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Primary pancreatic lymphoma: what we need to know.

Authors:  Neda Rad; Alireza Khafaf; Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-08

8.  Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions.

Authors:  Ji Young Bang; Jayapal Ramesh; Jessica Trevino; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Optimizing Diagnostic Yield for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Technical Review.

Authors:  Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-06

10.  Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Kumar Krishnan; Sachin Wani; Laurie Keefer; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.