Literature DB >> 27194267

Tissue diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumor only through Trucut biopsy under a forward-viewing endoscope: applicability as newer diagnostic modality.

Weon Jin Ko1, Ga Won Song1, Ki Baik Hahm1, Sung Pyo Hong1, Joo Young Cho2, Jun-Hyung Cho3, So Young Jin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trucut biopsy (TCB) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration for the pathologic diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumor (SET); however, it can be difficult to perform because the Trucut biopsy needle is very stiff. Although technical failures have been reported with the use of TCB, recently the forward-viewing echoendoscope showed a high diagnostic accuracy. We hypothesized that TCB under a conventional forward-viewing endoscope can be applied with higher yield of tissue diagnosis.
METHODS: To evaluate the feasibility of TCB under a forward-looking endoscopy without cumbersome EUS guidance, we introduced a 19-gauge TCB needle into the working channel of a conventional upper endoscope in 27 patients with GI SET to make tissue diagnosis. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, including technical success rate, pathologic result, and adverse events.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with GI SET (18 esophageal tumors and nine gastric tumors) underwent TCB under a forward-looking endoscope. All procedures were performed safely without any TCB-related complications. Subsequently, histopathology examination revealed gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in three cases and leiomyomas in 21 cases. Histologic assessment was completed in 24 out of 27 patients (88.9 %) because tissue obtained from three patients, whose tumors were located in the stomach, was not sufficient for the pathologic diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: TCB using a conventional forward-viewing endoscope without EUS guidance provided an excellent pathologic diagnosis of upper GI SET.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forward-viewing endoscope; Subepithelial tumor; Trucut biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27194267     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4846-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Jan-Werner Poley; Alberto Larghi; Marc Giovannini; Maria Chiara Petrone; Ihab Abdulkader; Genevieve Monges; Guido Costamagna; Paolo Arcidiacono; Katharina Biermann; Guido Rindi; Erwan Bories; Claudio Dogloni; Marco Bruno; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Analysis of 151 consecutive gastric submucosal tumors according to tumor location.

Authors:  Han Hong Lee; Hoon Hur; Hun Jung; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Birgit Guldhammer Skov; Claudia Valentina Georgescu
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥ 2 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Lee; Kee Don Choi; Mi-Young Kim; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Young Soo Park; Kab Choong Kim; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jeong Hwan Yook; Byung Sik Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope.

Authors:  Alberto Larghi; Lorenzo Fuccio; Gaia Chiarello; Fabia Attili; Giuseppe Vanella; Giovanni Battista Paliani; Matteo Napoleone; Guido Rindi; Luigi Maria Larocca; Guido Costamagna; Riccardo Ricci
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Comparison of EUS-guided FNA and Trucut biopsy for diagnosing and staging abdominal and mediastinal neoplasms.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kipp; Telma C Pereira; Paola C Souza; Ferga C Gleeson; Michael J Levy; Amy C Clayton
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.582

7.  Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience.

Authors:  Titus Thomas; Phillip V Kaye; Krish Ragunath; Guruprasad Aithal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Initial experience with the prototype forward-viewing echoendoscope for therapeutic interventions other than pancreatic pseudocyst drainage (with videos).

Authors:  Jessica M Trevino; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Mary Lou Jondal; Jonathan Clain; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Diagnostic procedures for submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Laura-Graves Ponsaing; Katalin Kiss; Annika Loft; Lise-Ingemann Jensen; Mark-Berner Hansen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and Endoscopic Management of Esophageal Submucosal Tumor.

Authors:  Weon Jin Ko; Ga Won Song; Joo Young Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-11-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.