Literature DB >> 23935542

Optimizing Diagnostic Yield for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Technical Review.

Brian R Weston1, Manoop S Bhutani.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has a higher diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer than other techniques. This article will review the current advances and considerations for optimizing diagnostic yield for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Preprocedural considerations include patient history, confirmation of appropriate indication, review of imaging, method of sedation, experience required by the endoscopist, and access to rapid on-site cytologic evaluation. New EUS imaging techniques that may assist with differential diagnoses include contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS, EUS elastography, and EUS spectrum analysis. FNA techniques vary, and multiple FNA needles are now commercially available; however, neither techniques nor available FNA needles have been definitively compared. The need for suction depends on the lesion, and the need for a stylet is equivocal. No definitive endosonographic finding can predict the optimal number of passes for diagnostic yield. Preparation of good smears and communication with the cytopathologist are essential to optimize yield.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic ultrasound—guided fine-needle aspiration; fine-needle biopsy; pancreatic lesions

Year:  2013        PMID: 23935542      PMCID: PMC3736792     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)        ISSN: 1554-7914


  105 in total

1.  A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarto C Paquin; Gilles Gariépy; Luigi Lepanto; Raymond Bourdages; Ginette Raymond; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Histological diagnosis by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic solid masses without on-site cytopathologist: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Takao Itoi; Takayoshi Tsuchiya; Fumihide Itokawa; Atsushi Sofuni; Toshio Kurihara; Shujiro Tsuji; Nobuhito Ikeuchi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.559

3.  Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; J Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Elena Eugenyeva; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Jeronimo Forteza-Vila
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery: a comparison of sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  J Shawn Mallery; Barbara A Centeno; Peter F Hahn; YuChiao Chang; Andrew L Warshaw; William R Brugge
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Utility of a repeated EUS at a tertiary-referral center.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Kathleen McGreevy; Stuart Sherman; Julia LeBlanc
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Hocke; Ewald Schulze; Peter Gottschalk; Theodor Topalidis; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience.

Authors:  Titus Thomas; Phillip V Kaye; Krish Ragunath; Guruprasad Aithal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  W Hartwig; L Schneider; M K Diener; F Bergmann; M W Büchler; J Werner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis.

Authors:  Rajesh Puri; Peter Vilmann; Adrian Săftoiu; Birgit Guldhammer Skov; Dorte Linnemann; Hazem Hassan; Elymir Soraya Galvis Garcia; Florin Gorunescu
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  19 in total

1.  The Role of Real Time Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Elastography for Targeting EUS-FNA of Suspicious Pancreatic Masses: A Review of the Literature and A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Mikram Jafri; Amit H Sachdev; Lauren Khanna; Frank G Gress
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2016-09

2.  Diagnostic potency of EUS-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh; Shabnam Shahrokh; Mohammad Hadizadeh; Maryam Padashi; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

3.  Papanicolaou society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology: Risk stratification and cytology scope - 2.5-year study.

Authors:  Abeer M Ilyas; Mamta Bohra; Nilam M More; Leena P Naik
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Comparison of specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of a 25-gauge and 22-gauge needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Authors:  Christopher Di Felice; Benjamin Young; Maroun Matta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables.

Authors:  Bhairvi S Jani; Fadi Rzouq; Shreyas Saligram; Diego Lim; Amit Rastogi; John Bonino; Mojtaba Olyaee
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-01

6.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration of solid lesions over time: Experience from a new endoscopic ultrasound program at a Canadian community hospital.

Authors:  Mohan Cooray; Irina Nistor; Joe Pham; Douglas Bair; Naveen Arya
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 7.  Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: How many passes?

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Yawen Li; Yun Wang; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Qian Chen; Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Yaqi Duan; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Reviewing the Utility of EUS FNA to Advance Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  William Berry; Joanne Lundy; Daniel Croagh; Brendan J Jenkins
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.