| Literature DB >> 22814581 |
D Nasrollahzadeh1, R Malekzadeh, K Aghcheli, M Sotoudeh, S Merat, F Islami, F Kamangar, C C Abnet, R Shakeri, A Pourshams, S Semnani, P Boffetta, S M Dawsey, W Ye.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastric fundal atrophy has been hypothesised to increase the risk of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but studies have shown inconsistent results.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22814581 PMCID: PMC3425966 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Characteristics of OSCC cases and matched controls, Golestan province, Iran, 2003–2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (s.d.), years | 64.4 (11.1) | 65.5 (10.4) | 0.95 | 62.1 (9.9) | 0.07 |
|
| |||||
| Men | 147 (50.2) | 256 (48.8) | 0.71 | 22 (46.8) | 0.8 |
| Women | 146 (49.8) | 268 (51.2) | 25 (53.2) | ||
|
| |||||
| Urban | 80 (27.3) | 133 (25.4) | 0.54 | 17 (36.2) | 0.1 |
| Rural | 213 (72.7) | 391 (74.6) | 30 (63.8) | ||
|
| |||||
| Turkmen | 166 (56.7) | 282 (53.8) | 0.43 | 30 (63.8) | 0.18 |
| Non-Turkmen | 127 (43.3) | 242 (46.2) | 17 (36.2) | ||
|
| |||||
| Illiterate | 261 (89.1) | 437 (83.4) | 0.02 | 37 (87.7) | 0.41 |
| Primary school and higher | 32 (10.9) | 87 (16.6) | 10 (21.3) | ||
|
| |||||
| No | 287 (98) | 511 (97.5) | 0.69 | 46 (97.9) | 0.88 |
| Yes | 6 (2) | 13 (2.5) | 1 (2.1) | ||
| Neither | 162 (55.5) | 366 (70.0) | 0.0002 | 32 (68.1) | 0.58 |
| Ever use tobacco | 43 (14.7) | 59 (11.3) | 7 (14.9) | ||
| Ever use opium | 29 (10.0) | 33 (6.3) | 1 (2.1) | ||
| Ever use tobacco and opium | 58 (19.8) | 65 (12.4) | 7 (14.9) | ||
|
| |||||
| ⩽ Median | 139 (47.4) | 235 (44.8) | 0.47 | 20 (42.5) | 0.76 |
| > Median | 154 (52.6) | 289 (55.1) | 27 (57.5) | ||
|
| |||||
| ⩽ Median (28) | 117 (40.3) | 266 (51.0) | 0.004 | 28 (59.6) | 0.25 |
| > Median | 173 (59.7) | 256 (49.0) | 19 (40.4) | ||
|
| |||||
| Ever | 59 (20.3) | 221 (42.4) | <0.0001 | 18 (39.1) | 0.66 |
| Never | 232 (79.7) | 300 (57.6) | 28 (60.9) | ||
| PGI ( | 109.3 (67.2–147.5) | 94.9 (66.6–123.3) | NA | ||
| PGII ( | 14.2 (9.6–21.5) | 12.3 (8.8–18.2) | NA | ||
| PGI/PGII ratio, median (IQR) | 7.0 (4.8–9.7) | 7.2 (5.3–9.9) | NA | ||
Abbreviations: DMFT=Sum of decayed, missed, and filled teeth; IQR=interquartile range; NA=not applicable; OSCC=oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
P-value for significance of difference between controls with and without serum samples.
Numbers of cases and controls were less than total because of missed data.
Median fruit and vegetable consumption=521.8 gr/day.
Levels of pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and H. pylori serology and their associations with OSCC risk, Golestan province, Iran, 2003–2007
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⩾ 55 | 449 (85.7) | 238 (81.2) | Referent | Referent |
| < 55 | 75 (14.3) | 55 (18.8) | 1.33 (0.89–1.97) | 1.39 (0.93–2.09) |
| <11.8 | 246 (46.9) | 113 (38.7) | Referent | Referent |
| ⩾ 11.8 | 278 (53.1) | 179 (63.1) | 1.37 (1.01–1.85) | 1.40 (1.01–1.92) |
| PGI ⩾55 and PGII<11.8 | 189 (36.1) | 71 (24.2) | Referent | Referent |
| PGI <55 and PGII <11.8 | 57 (10.9) | 42 (14.3) | 1.92 (1.15–3.22) | 2.01 (1.18–3.45) |
| PGI ⩾55 and PGII ⩾11.8 | 260 (49.6) | 167 (57) | Referent | Referent |
| PGI<55 and PGII ⩾11.8 | 18 (3.4) | 12 (4.4) | 1.02 (0.47–2.23) | 1.20 (0.54–2.66) |
|
| ||||
| | 52 (10) | 35 (12) | Referent | Referent |
| | 34 (6.5) | 14 (4.8) | 0.64 (0.30–1.35) | 0.70 (0.32–1.53) |
| | 351 (67.2) | 179 (61.3) | 0.73 (0.46–1.17) | 0.79 (0.48–1.29) |
| | 85 (16.3) | 64 (21.9) | 1.05 (0.60–1.85) | 1.15 (0.63–2.08) |
Abbreviations: cagA=cytotoxin-associated gene A; CI=confidence interval; H. pylori=Helicobacter pylori; OR=odds ratio; OSCC=oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; PGI=pepsinogen I; PGII=pepsinogen II.
Adjusted for ethnicity (Non-Turkmen or Turkmen), alcohol consumption (never or ever), tobacco or opium use (none, only tobacco, only opium, or both), education level (illiterate, primary school or more), and vegetable/fruit consumption.
For one case, PGII level was missing and just PGI level was available.
Gastric atrophy defined by other serology criteria in literature and its association with OSCC risk
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| PGI ⩾30 | 500 (95.4) | 274 (93.5) | Referent |
| PGI <30 | 24 (4.6) | 19 (6.5) | 1.52 (0.79–2.93) |
|
| |||
| PGI ⩾30 and PGII<11.8 | 226 (43.1) | 97 (33.1) | Referent |
| PGI <30 and PGII <11.8 | 4 (0.8) | 3 (1.0) | 1.94 (0.91–4.13) |
| PGI ⩾30 and PGII ⩾11.8 | 274 (52.3) | 176 (60.4) | Referent |
| PGI <30 and PGII ⩾11.8 | 20 (3.8) | 16 (5.5) | 1.10 (0.23–5.17) |
|
| |||
| Ratio ⩾3 | 490 (93.5) | 265 (90.8) | Referent |
| Ratio <3 | 34 (6.5) | 27 (9.2) | 1.50 (0.85–2.60) |
|
| |||
| Ratio ⩾3 and PGII <11.8 | 233 (44.5) | 100 (34.1) | Referent |
| Ratio <3 and PGII <11.8 | 21 (4.0) | 14 (4.8) | 2.32 (1.00–5.39) |
| Ratio ⩾3 and PGII ⩾11.8 | 257 (49.0) | 165 (56.7) | Referent |
| Ratio<30 and PGII ⩾11.8 | 13 (2.5) | 13 (4.4) | 1.03 (0.49–2.20) |
|
| |||
| PGI ⩾70 or ratio ⩾3 | 497 (94.9) | 267 (91.5) | Referent |
| PGI <70 and ratio <3 | 27 (5.1) | 25 (8.5) | 1.69 (0.93–3.10) |
|
| |||
| (PGI ⩾70 or ratio ⩾3) and PGII <11.8 | 233 (44.5) | 100 (34.19) | Referent |
| (PGI <70 and ratio <3) and PGII <11.8 | 14 (2.6) | 12 (4.1) | 2.31 (0.99–5.38) |
| (PGI ⩾70 or ratio ⩾3) and PGII ⩾11.8 | 264 (50.4) | 167 (57.4) | Referent |
| (PGI <70 and ratio <3) and PGII ⩾11.8 | 13 (2.5) | 13 (4.4) | 1.24 (0.52–2.94) |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio; OSCC=oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; PGI=pepsinogen I; PGII=pepsinogen II.
Adjusted for ethnicity (Non-Turkmen or Turkmen), alcohol consumption (never or ever), tobacco or opium use (none, only tobacco, only opium, or both), education level (illiterate, primary school or more), and vegetable/fruit consumption.
For one case, PGII level was missing and just PGI level was available.
Combined effects of gastric atrophy and dental health or oral hygiene habit on OSCC risk after breaking the matching factors
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| DMFT ⩽28 | 29/104 | Referent | 12/26 | 1.65 (0.74–3.67) |
| DMFT >28 | 40/84 | 1.71 (0.98–2.98) | 30/31 | 3.47 (1.81–6.64) |
| Ever tooth brushing | 14/87 | Referent | 5/24 | 1.40 (0.44–4.39) |
| Never tooth brushing | 57/100 | 4.12 (2.05–8.28) | 37/33 | 8.77 (3.89–19.72) |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; DMFT=sum of decayed, missed, and filled teeth; OR=odds ratio; OSCC=oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Measure of interaction on additive scale: relative excess risk due to interaction with low DMFT (95% CI): 1.47 (−1.15 to 4.1) and with never tooth brushing habit (95% CI): 4.34 (−1.07 to 9.76).
Measure of interaction on multiplicative scale: between atrophy and low DMFT: OR (95% CI): 1.44 (0.63–3.32); P=0.39 and measure of interaction between atrophy and never tooth brushing on multiplicative scale: OR (95% CI): 1.78 (0.30–10.42); P=0.52.
ORs (95% CI) levels adjusted for age, sex, residence area, ethnicity (Non-Turkmen or Turkmen), alcohol consumption (never or ever), tobacco or opium use (none, only tobacco, only opium, or both), education level (illiterate, primary school or more), and vegetable/fruit consumption.
Gastric atrophy defined by PGI <55 μg l−1 and its association with OSCC risk under assumption of various sensitivity (se) and specificity (sp) among cases and controls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||||||
| All PGII | 0.62 | 0.95 | 1.63 |
| 6.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 0.59 |
| Only PGII <5 | 0.99 | 0.68 |
| 0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Only PGII <11.8 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.6 | a | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Only PGII <15 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.8 | a | 3.3 | 1.97 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| Only PGII <19 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.9 |
| 3.6 | 2.2 | 1.83 | 1.3 | 0.3 |
| Only PGII <30 | 0.76 | 0.94 | 1.1 |
| 4.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.65 | 1.66 |
| Only PGII >11.8 | 0.37 | 0.98 | 4.7 |
| 19.1 | 11.4 | 9.6 | 6.8 | 1.69 |
Abbreviations: OSCC=oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; PGI=pepsinogen I; PGII=pepsinogen II.
ORs are adjusted for age, sex, and residence area in unconditional logistic regression model.
These cells yielded negative adjusted counts, which were impossible values for true counts, thus corrected ORs could not be estimated.