| Literature DB >> 22811737 |
Mayra Silva Miranda1, Adrien Breiman, Sophie Allain, Florence Deknuydt, Frederic Altare.
Abstract
One of the main features of the immune response to M. Tuberculosis is the formation of an organized structure called granuloma. It consists mainly in the recruitment at the infectious stage of macrophages, highly differentiated cells such as multinucleated giant cells, epithelioid cells and Foamy cells, all these cells being surrounded by a rim of lymphocytes. Although in the first instance the granuloma acts to constrain the infection, some bacilli can actually survive inside these structures for a long time in a dormant state. For some reasons, which are still unclear, the bacilli will reactivate in 10% of the latently infected individuals, escape the granuloma and spread throughout the body, thus giving rise to clinical disease, and are finally disseminated throughout the environment. In this review we examine the process leading to the formation of the granulomatous structures and the different cell types that have been shown to be part of this inflammatory reaction. We also discuss the different in vivo and in vitro models available to study this fascinating immune structure.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22811737 PMCID: PMC3395138 DOI: 10.1155/2012/139127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Dev Immunol ISSN: 1740-2522
Figure 1Formation and maturation of lung tuberculous granulomas. Following inhalation of contaminated aerosols, M. Tuberculosis moves to the lower respiratory tract where it is recognized by alveolar macrophages. This recognition is mediated by a set of surface receptors (see text), which drive the uptake of the bacteria and trigger innate immune signalling pathways leading to the production of various chemokines and cytokines (a). Epithelial cells and neutrophils can also produce chemokines in response to bacterial products (not represented). This promotes recruitment of other immune cells (more macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes) to the infection site (b). They organise in a spherical structure with infected macrophages in the middle surrounded by various categories of lymphocytes (mainly CD4+, CD8+, and γ/δ T cells). Macrophages (MP) can fuse to form MGCs or differentiate into lipid-rich foamy cells (FM). B lymphocytes tend to aggregate in follicular-type structures adjacent to the granuloma ((c), see text for details). The bacteria can survive for decades inside the granuloma in a latent state. Due to some environmental (e.g., HIV infection, malnutrition etc.) or genetic factors, the bacteria will reactivate and provoke the death of the infected macrophages. A necrotic zone (called caseum due to its milky appearance) will develop in the centre of the granuloma (d). Ultimately the structure will disintegrate allowing exit of the bacteria, which will spread in other parts of the lungs and more lesions will be formed. Infection will also be transmitted to other individuals due to release of the infected droplets by coughing (e).
Main chemokines and cytokines involved in the granulomatous response.
| Chemokines/cytokines | Main producers | Targets/role |
|---|---|---|
| CXCL8 (IL-8) | Alveolar macrophages. | Recruitment of neutrophils. |
| Epithelial cells of the lung. | ||
|
| ||
| CCL2 (MCP-1) | Monocytes and alveolar macrophages. | Recruitment of macrophages and other immune cells. |
|
| ||
| CCL3 (MIP-1a), CCL4 (MIP-1b) CCL5 (RANTES) | Alveolar macrophages. | Recruitment of macrophages and other immune cells. |
|
| ||
| CXCL9, CXCL10 (IP-10), CXCL11 | Bronchial epithelial cells. | Recruitment of immune cells. |
|
| ||
| CCL19/CCL21 | Stromal cells of the lymph nodes. | Recruitment and priming of IFN- |
| Migration of DC from the lung to draining lymph nodes. | ||
|
| ||
| CXCL13 | Dendritic cells, stromal cells of the lymph nodes. | Recruitment of B cells and formation of the granuloma-associated follicular structures. |
|
| ||
| IL-12/IL-23 | Dendritic cells, macrophages. | Th1 polarisation of CD4+ T cells. |
|
| ||
| IFN- | CD4+ (Th1) and CD8+ T cells, NK. | Activation of macrophages. |
| Induction of NO synthesis and bacterial killing. | ||
|
| ||
| TNF- | CD4+ T cells (Th1), macrophages. | Proinflammatory. |
| Induction of chemokine production. | ||
| Activation of macrophages. | ||
| Critical for granuloma formation. | ||
|
| ||
| IL-1 | Macrophages, DCs. | Proinflammatory. |
| Recruitment and activation of phagocytes. | ||
|
| ||
| IL-17 | LT | Proinflammatory. |
| Involved in neutrophil recruitment and macrophage activation. | ||
|
| ||
| IL-10 | Tregs, B-1 cells, AAM. | Anti-inflammatory. |
| Polarisation of macrophages towards the AAM type. | ||
|
| ||
| TGF- | Tregs, AAM. | Anti-inflammatory. |
Models for studying Mtb infection and the granulomatous response.
| Model | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Monkey | Granuloma similar to humans. | Difficult to handle. |
| Expensive. | ||
|
| ||
| Guinea pigs/rabbits | Granuloma similar to humans. | Restricted availability of reagents. |
| Easy to handle. | Genetic manipulation difficult. | |
|
| ||
| Mice | Easy to handle. | Granulomas often differ in many ways from |
| Model of choice for genetic studies. | human granulomas (e.g., cellular composition and progression to necrosis). | |
|
| ||
| Zebrafish embryo | Easy to handle. |
|
| Good for real-time experiments and live imaging (the larvae are transparent). | ||
| Good for studies of the initial steps of granuloma formation and the role of innate immunity. | No lymphocytes present in the embryo. | |
|
| ||
|
| Mimics the physiological granuloma. | Some important elements present in the lung compartment but not in PBMCs may be lacking. |
| Possible to study the early steps of granuloma formation. | ||
| Flexible (e.g., use of various strains of bacteria, easy addition of cells, cytokines, drugs). | ||
|
| ||
|
| Not expensive. | Highly dependent on the initial parameter settings and cannot take previously unknown information into account. |
| Study of the early steps of granuloma formation possible. | ||
| Flexible. | ||