| Literature DB >> 22809051 |
Rosenani A Haque1, Muhammad Adnan Iqbal, Mohamed B Khadeer Ahamed, Ams Abdul Majid, Zena A Abdul Hameed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22809051 PMCID: PMC3542276 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-6-68
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Synthesis of free NHC from benzimidazolium salt and orbital view of a benzimidazolium-based NHC [[10]].
Scheme 1Synthesis of N-alkyl benzimidazoles (1-7) and 3,3'-(1,3-phenylene(methylene))(1-alkyl-Benzimidazolium) salts (8-13).
Figure 2FT-IR overlay spectrum of -alkylated benzimidazoles (1-7).
Figure 3H NMR spectrum (-DMSO, 400 MHz) indicating the changes in chemical shifts after successful reaction (between 6 & 13).
Figure 4Relative deshielding of methylene groups, attached directly to benzimidazolium units in NMR spectroscopy.
Crystal data and structure refinement details for compounds 10 and 13
| Formula | C36H32Br2N4 | C28H32F12N4P2 |
| Formula Weight | 680.48 | 714.52 |
| Crystal System | Triclinic | Monoclinic |
| Space group | P ī | Cc |
| a, b, c [Å] | 11.0707(3), 11.3028(3), 14.8929(3) | 16.2520(9), 12.0683(7), 16.2980(9) |
| α, β, ϒ [deg] | 84.963(1), 75.975(1), 87.924(1) | 90, 103.064(10), 90 |
| V [Ang**3] | 1800.80(8) | 3152.2(3) |
| Z | 2 | 4 |
| D(calc)[g/cm**3] | 1.255 | 1.506 |
| Mu(MoKa)[/mm] | 2.278 | 0.236 |
| F(000) | 692 | 1464 |
| Crystal Size[mm] | 0.56 × 0.45 × 0.29 | 0.58× 0.36 × 0.30 |
| Temperature (K) | 90(2) | 293(2) |
| Radiation [Å] | MoKa 0.71073 | MoKa 0.71073 |
| 1.41 – 28.95 | 2.11 – 30.070 | |
| Dataset | −15:15;−15:15;−20 :20 | −23:23;−16:16;−22:22 |
| Tot.; Uniq. Data | 33351 | 32572 |
| R(int) | 0.0308 | 0.0225 |
| Nref;Npar | 9480; 379 | 2023; 585 |
| R, wR2, S | 0.0472, 0.1376, 1.076 | 0.0226, 0.1293, 1.029 |
Selected bond lengths and angles of salt 102Br
| C6-C7 | 1.513(4) | C15-C16 | 1.515(4) | N3-C23 | 1.331(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C7-N1 | 1.481(3) | C16-C21 | 1.392(4) | C23-N4 | 1.332(4) |
| N1-C8 | 1.330(4) | C21-C20 | 1.383(4) | N4-C30 | 1.465(4) |
| N2-C8 | 1.339(4) | C20-C22 | 1.516(4) | C30-C31 | 1.511(4) |
| C15-N2 | 1.478(3) | C22-N3 | 1.464(3) | C21-H21 | 0.9500 |
| C6-C7-N1 | 112.0(2) | | C20-C22-N3 | 110.7(2) | |
| C7-N1-C8 | 124.5(2) | | C22-N3-C23 | 126.1(2) | |
| N1-C8-N2 | 110.0(3) | | N3-C23-N4 | 109.9(2) | |
| C8-N2-C15 | 125.0(2) | | C23-N4-C30 | 125.6(2) | |
| N2-C15-C16 | 110.3(2) | N4-C30-C31 | 111.9(3) |
Selected bond lengths and angles of salt 132PF
| C2-C3 | 1.466(7) | C11-C12 | 1.516(3) | N3-C25 | 1.317(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3-N2 | 1.508(4) | C12-C17 | 1.382(2) | C25-N4 | 1.338(3) |
| N2-C4 | 1.325(4) | C17-C16 | 1.384(2) | N4-C26 | 1.470(3) |
| C4-N1 | 1.321(3) | C16-C18 | 1.509(3) | C26-C27 | 1.484(6) |
| N1-C11 | 1.468(3) | C18-N3 | 1.474(2) | P1-F1 | 1.506(8) |
| C2-C3-N2 | 112.4(4) | | C16-C18-N3 | 112.19(15) | |
| C3-N2-C4 | 132.4(2) | | C18-N3-C25 | 126.18(18) | |
| N2-C4-N1 | 111.0(2) | | N3-C25-N4 | 110.81(18) | |
| C4-N1-C11 | 127.0(2) | | C25-N4-C26 | 107.9(9) | |
| N1-C11-C12 | 111.95(16) | N4-C26-C27 | 113.9(3) |
Figure 5The ORTEP picture of bis-benzimidazolium salt 10.2Br with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability. See Figure 6A for its Packing (Triclinic).
Figure 6The ORTEP picture of bis-benzimidazolium salt 13.2PF with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability and crystal packing (Monoclinic).
Figure 7Anti-proliferation effect of benzimidazolium salts on HCT-116 was assessed by MTT-assay. The figure depicts dose-dependent activity of all tested compounds. The activity of salts, 8, 9, 10 & 12 was more profound than 5-FU (values are represented as mean ± SD n=3).
ICValues of selected Compounds
| 0.2 μM | |
| 4.1 μM | |
| 0.1 μM | |
| 8.7 μM | |
| 1.1 μM | |
| 17.6 μM | |
| 19.2 μM |
Figure 8HCT116 cell images were taken under an invented phased-contrast microscope at ×200 magnification with a digital camera at 48 hours after treatment with the samples.A) Cells from the control group showed fully confluent growth. B) Treatment with 8.2PF6 showed marked inhibition in cell proliferation with IC50=0.2μM. The picture revealed the autophagic characteristic in the cells as all cells treated with 8.2PF6 showed abnormally large number of vacuoles (arrows) in cytoplasm. C) HCT 116 cells treated with the compound 9.2PF6 exhibited significant cytotoxity (IC50=4.1μM) as the population of cells reduced drastically within the 48 hours of treatment. D) Photomicrograph depicts the strong cytotoxic effect of 10.2Br (0.1μM). It can be seen clearly that the compound affected the normal morphology of most all the cells of the group which rendered the cells lose viability. E) Treatment with 11.2PF6 showed the modest inhibition with IC508.7μM. F) Treatment with 12.PF6 caused sever death in HCT 116 cells as the cells appeared to be entered in apoptosis by the typhical morphological changes.