Literature DB >> 22807952

Co-expression of ERCC1 and Snail is a prognostic but not predictive factor of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Atsunari Kawashima1, Hitoshi Takayama, Norihiko Kawamura, Noriteru Doi, Mototaka Sato, Koji Hatano, Akira Nagahara, Motohide Uemura, Yasutomo Nakai, Kensaku Nishimura, Susumu Miyoshi, Kiyoshi Kawano, Kazuo Nishimura, Norio Nonomura, Akira Tsujimura.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for bladder cancer has been reported to significantly improve the 5-year survival rate. The aim of the present study was to examine the roles of ERCC1 and Snail in determining the response to chemotherapy in bladder cancer treated with NC and radical cystectomy (RC). The expression of the Snail and ERCC1 proteins was determined by immunohistochemical staining of specimens obtained from 58 patients with bladder tumors treated with NC and RC. The correlation between clinical response and the expression of Snail and ERCC1 was investigated. Snail and ERCC1 were co-expressed in 24 (41.4%) of the 58 patients. A marked correlation was found between the expression of Snail and ERCC1 (P=0.001). The co-expression of Snail and ERCC1 was not able to predict pathological complete response (P=0.202). Results of the univariate analysis revealed that the co-expression of Snail and ERCC1 predicted shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than the negative expression of Snail and/or ERCC1. Moreover, the co-expression of ERCC1 and Snail was the only predictive factor for both DFS (P=0.029) and OS (P=0.040). The expression of Snail was correlated with that of ERCC1 and the co-expression of Snail and ERCC1 was the only significant predictive factor of shorter DFS and OS in patients with bladder cancer treated with NC and RC.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807952      PMCID: PMC3398367          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  27 in total

1.  Validation study of the prediction system for clinical response of M-VAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ryo Takata; Toyomasa Katagiri; Mitsugu Kanehira; Taro Shuin; Tsuneharu Miki; Mikio Namiki; Kenjiro Kohri; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Tomoaki Fujioka; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  Gene expression of ERCC1 as a novel prognostic marker in advanced bladder cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Bellmunt; L Paz-Ares; M Cuello; F L Cecere; S Albiol; V Guillem; E Gallardo; J Carles; P Mendez; J J de la Cruz; M Taron; R Rosell; J Baselga
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kyoung Ha Kim; In-Gu Do; Hyeong Su Kim; Myung Hee Chang; Hyo Song Kim; Hyun Jung Jun; Jieun Uhm; Seong Yoon Yi; Do Hyoung Lim; Sang Hoon Ji; Min Jae Park; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Ghee Young Kwon; Ho Yeong Lim
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  MDR1 and ERCC1 expression predict outcome of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann; Peter Wild; Christina Leicht; Simone Bertz; Kathleen D Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg; Robert Stöhr; Michael Stöckle; Jan Lehmann; Martin Schuler; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ken A Olaussen; Ariane Dunant; Pierre Fouret; Elisabeth Brambilla; Fabrice André; Vincent Haddad; Estelle Taranchon; Martin Filipits; Robert Pirker; Helmut H Popper; Rolf Stahel; Laure Sabatier; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Thomas Tursz; Thierry Le Chevalier; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  BRCA1 mRNA expression and outcome to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  A Font; M Taron; J L Gago; C Costa; J J Sánchez; C Carrato; M Mora; P Celiz; L Perez; D Rodríguez; A Gimenez-Capitan; V Quiroga; S Benlloch; L Ibarz; R Rosell
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Purification and characterization of the XPF-ERCC1 complex of human DNA repair excision nuclease.

Authors:  C H Park; T Bessho; T Matsunaga; A Sancar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  SIP1 protein protects cells from DNA damage-induced apoptosis and has independent prognostic value in bladder cancer.

Authors:  A Emre Sayan; Thomas R Griffiths; Raj Pal; Gareth J Browne; Andrew Ruddick; Tamer Yagci; Richard Edwards; Nick J Mayer; Hasan Qazi; Sandeep Goyal; Serena Fernandez; Kees Straatman; George D D Jones; Karen J Bowman; Alexandra Colquhoun; J Kilian Mellon; Marina Kriajevska; Eugene Tulchinsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Current status of excision repair cross complementing-group 1 (ERCC1) in cancer.

Authors:  Lucy Gossage; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from SMAD4 loss in squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Ariel L Hernandez; Christian D Young; Jing H Wang; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Individualized chemotherapy for osteosarcoma and identification of gene mutations in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Xin Xiao; Wei Wang; Haoqiang Zhang; Peng Gao; Bo Fan; Chen Huang; Jun Fu; Guojing Chen; Lei Shi; Haodong Zhu; Xiangdong Li; Jing Li; Hongbin Fan; Zhigang Wu; Zheng Guo; Yongcheng Hu; Sujia Wu; Xiuchun Yu; Cheng Xu; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-28

Review 3.  Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoukos; Angeliki Andrikopoulou; Nikos Dedes; Flora Zagouri; Aristotelis Bamias; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Snail1 expression in colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinical and pathological parameters.

Authors:  Feride Kroepil; Georg Fluegen; Daniel Vallböhmer; Stephan E Baldus; Levent Dizdar; Andreas M Raffel; Dieter Hafner; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Wolfram T Knoefel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Smad4 loss in mouse keratinocytes leads to increased susceptibility to UV carcinogenesis with reduced Ercc1-mediated DNA repair.

Authors:  Doyel Mitra; Pamela Fernandez; Li Bian; Ningjing Song; Fulun Li; Gangwen Han; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  Predictive Value of Ercc1 and Xpd Polymorphisms for Clinical Outcomes of Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prisma-Compliant Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mao Qixing; Dong Gaochao; Xia Wenjie; Yin Rong; Jiang Feng; Xu Lin; Qiu Mantang; Chen Qiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.