Literature DB >> 21091775

Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Kyoung Ha Kim1, In-Gu Do, Hyeong Su Kim, Myung Hee Chang, Hyo Song Kim, Hyun Jung Jun, Jieun Uhm, Seong Yoon Yi, Do Hyoung Lim, Sang Hoon Ji, Min Jae Park, Jeeyun Lee, Se Hoon Park, Ghee Young Kwon, Ho Yeong Lim.   

Abstract

Cisplatin has been the cornerstone of the chemotherapy regimen for urothelial carcinoma. Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is a key component of the platinum-DNA repair machinery responsible for nucleotide excision repair. Recent reports have suggested that ERCC1 is a predictive and prognostic marker in solid cancers treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. We performed this study to determine whether or not immunohistochemical expression of ERCC1 can predict objective tumor response and cancer-specific survival in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of 89 patients with advanced or recurrent urothelial cancer, who had undergone treatment at Samsung Medical Center between May 2001 and August 2007. Pretherapeutic biopsy samples from 89 patients with a known tumor response were available. ERCC1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Of the 89 patients, ERCC1 expression was positive in 49 patients (55%). The overall response rate after chemotherapy was 68.5% (95% CI 54.8-74.8%). Among 61 patients who obtained a response, 27 were negative for ERCC-1 expression and 34 were positive (p = 0.61). Median duration of follow-up was 53.7 months (range 14.4-152.3 months). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months for ERCC-1-negative patients and 8.4 months for ERCC-1-positive patients (p = 0.03); the difference in overall survival between patients with ERCC-1-negative tumors and ERCC-1-positive tumors (p = 0.73) was not statistically significant. Other than ERCC1 expression, there was no independent prognostic factor for PFS. These results suggest a negative contribution by ERCC1expression to PFS in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 APMIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091775     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  19 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers for prognosis and treatment selection in advanced bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuanbin Ru; Garrett M Dancik; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  [Current developments in the diagnostics and therapy of bladder carcinoma].

Authors:  J Kamradt; C-H Ohlmann; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Co-expression of ERCC1 and Snail is a prognostic but not predictive factor of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Atsunari Kawashima; Hitoshi Takayama; Norihiko Kawamura; Noriteru Doi; Mototaka Sato; Koji Hatano; Akira Nagahara; Motohide Uemura; Yasutomo Nakai; Kensaku Nishimura; Susumu Miyoshi; Kiyoshi Kawano; Kazuo Nishimura; Norio Nonomura; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  DNA Damage Response and Repair Gene Alterations Are Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Min Yuen Teo; Richard M Bambury; Emily C Zabor; Emmet Jordan; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Mariel E Boyd; Nancy Bouvier; Stephanie A Mullane; Eugene K Cha; Nitin Roper; Irina Ostrovnaya; David M Hyman; Bernard H Bochner; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Michael F Berger; Dean F Bajorin; Joaquim Bellmunt; Gopakumar Iyer; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Biomarkers for bladder cancer management: present and future.

Authors:  Fei Ye; Li Wang; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Russell McBride; Matthew D Galsky; Jun Zhu; Paolo Boffetta; David Y Zhang; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-04-05

6.  ERCC1 in advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: prognostic and predictive roles.

Authors:  Vanessa da Costa Miranda; Maria Ignez Braghiroli; Luiza Dib Batista Bugiato Faria; Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira; Jorge Sabbaga; Paulo M Hoff; Rachel P Riechelmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

7.  Expression of ribonucleoside reductase subunit M1, but not excision repair cross-complementation group 1, is predictive in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation.

Authors:  Mark Shilkrut; Angela Wu; Dafydd G Thomas; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20

8.  ERCC1 as a biomarker for bladder cancer patients likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jong-Mu Sun; Ji-Youn Sung; Se Hoon Park; Ghee Young Kwon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Jisuk Jo; Han Yong Choi; Ho Yeong Lim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A Review of ERCC1 Gene in Bladder Cancer: Implications for Carcinogenesis and Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Atsunari Kawashima; Hitoshi Takayama; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10-26

10.  Progress in personalizing chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  James S Chang; Primo N Lara; Chong-Xian Pan
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.