Literature DB >> 20689757

MDR1 and ERCC1 expression predict outcome of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann1, Peter Wild, Christina Leicht, Simone Bertz, Kathleen D Danenberg, Peter V Danenberg, Robert Stöhr, Michael Stöckle, Jan Lehmann, Martin Schuler, Arndt Hartmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer still remains to be defined. We hypothesized that assessing the gene expression of the chemotherapy response modifiers multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) and excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) may help identify the group of patients benefiting from cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 108 patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, who had been enrolled in AUO-AB05/95, a phase 3 trial randomizing a maximum of three courses of adjuvant cisplatin and methotrexate (CM) versus methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and cisplatin (M-VEC), were included in the study. Tumor cells were retrieved by laser-captured microdissection and analyzed for MDR1 and ERCC1 expression using a quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. Gene expression levels were correlated with clinical outcomes by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
RESULTS: Expressions of MDR1 and ERCC1 were independently associated with overall progression-free survival (P = .001, relative risk = 2.9 and P = .01, relative risk = 2.24, respectively). The correlation of high MDR1 expression with inferior outcome was stronger in patients receiving M-VEC, whereas ERCC1 analysis performed equally in the CM and M-VEC groups.
CONCLUSIONS: High MDR1 and ERCC1 gene expressions are associated with inferior outcome after cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced bladder cancer. Prospective studies are warranted to define a role for MDR1 and ERCC1 analysis in individualizing multimodality treatment in locally advanced bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689757      PMCID: PMC2915407          DOI: 10.1593/neo.10402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  38 in total

1.  Neo-adjuvant (pre-emptive) cisplatin therapy in invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  D M Wallace; D Raghavan; K A Kelly; T F Sandeman; I G Conn; N Teriana; J Dunn; J Boulas; T Latief
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1991-06

Review 2.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Preliminary results of M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) for transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

Authors:  C N Sternberg; A Yagoda; H I Scher; R C Watson; T Ahmed; L R Weiselberg; N Geller; P S Hollander; H W Herr; P C Sogani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A prospective randomized trial comparing MVAC and CISCA chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial tumors.

Authors:  C J Logothetis; F H Dexeus; L Finn; A Sella; R J Amato; A G Ayala; R G Kilbourn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Adjuvant polychemotherapy of nonorgan-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy revisited: long-term results of a controlled prospective study and further clinical experience.

Authors:  M Stöckle; W Meyenburg; S Wellek; G E Voges; M Rossmann; U Gertenbach; J W Thüroff; C Huber; R Hohenfellner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Expression of P-glycoprotein in high-grade osteosarcomas in relation to clinical outcome.

Authors:  N Baldini; K Scotlandi; G Barbanti-Bròdano; M C Manara; D Maurici; G Bacci; F Bertoni; P Picci; S Sottili; M Campanacci
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Molecular manipulations of the multidrug transporter: a new role for transgenic mice.

Authors:  I Pastan; M C Willingham; M Gottesman
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  P-glycoprotein expression in primary and metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  D P Petrylak; H I Scher; V Reuter; J P O'Brien; C Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Muscularis mucosa differentiates two populations with different prognosis in stage T1 bladder cancer.

Authors:  J C Angulo; J I Lopez; D J Grignon; M Sanchez-Chapado
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: a prospective comparative trial.

Authors:  D G Skinner; J R Daniels; C A Russell; G Lieskovsky; S D Boyd; P Nichols; W Kern; J Sakamoto; M Krailo; S Groshen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  59 in total

1.  The interconnectedness of cancer cell signaling.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  A novel role for BDNF-TrkB in the regulation of chemotherapy resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Junegoo Lee; Tilahun Jiffar; Michael E Kupferman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Biomarkers for prognosis and treatment selection in advanced bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuanbin Ru; Garrett M Dancik; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 4.  [Current developments in the diagnostics and therapy of bladder carcinoma].

Authors:  J Kamradt; C-H Ohlmann; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  [Predictive biomarkers in bladder cancer].

Authors:  H Reis; T Szarvas
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Co-expression of ERCC1 and Snail is a prognostic but not predictive factor of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Atsunari Kawashima; Hitoshi Takayama; Norihiko Kawamura; Noriteru Doi; Mototaka Sato; Koji Hatano; Akira Nagahara; Motohide Uemura; Yasutomo Nakai; Kensaku Nishimura; Susumu Miyoshi; Kiyoshi Kawano; Kazuo Nishimura; Norio Nonomura; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Predictive biomarkers for combined chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in oro- and hypopharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Hasegawa; Mitsuo Goto; Nobuhiro Hanai; Taijiro Ozawa; Hitoshi Hirakawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29

Review 8.  Contemporary management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Liang Cheng; Chong-Xian Pan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.512

9.  Prognostic role of ERCC1 protein expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Michela de Martino; Romain Mathieu; Andrea Haitel; Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Morgan Rouprêt; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Michael Rink; Malte Rieken; Alon Z Weizer; Jay D Raman; Nathalie Rioux-Leclecq; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Pharmacogenomics in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Garrett M Dancik; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.