Literature DB >> 16040555

Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation.

K Salter1, J W Jutai, R Teasell, N C Foley, J Bitensky, M Bayley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychometric and administrative properties of outcome measures in the ICF Participation category, which are used in stroke rehabilitation research and reported in the published literature.
METHOD: Critical review and synthesis of measurement properties for six commonly reported instruments in the stroke rehabilitation literature. Each instrument was rated using the eight evaluation criteria proposed by the UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme. The instruments were also assessed for the rigour with which their reliability, validity and responsiveness were reported in the published literature.
RESULTS: Validity has been well reported for at least half of the measures reviewed. However, methods for reporting specific measurement qualities of outcome instruments were inconsistent. Responsiveness of measures has not been well documented. Of the three ICF categories, Participation seems to be most problematic with respect to: (a) lack of consensus on the range of domains required for measurement in stroke; (b) much greater emphasis on health-related quality of life, relative to subjective quality of life in general; (c) the inclusion of a mixture of measurements from all three ICF categories.
CONCLUSIONS: The reader is encouraged to examine carefully the nature and scope of outcome measurement used in reporting the strength of evidence for improved participation associated with stroke rehabilitation. There is no consensus regarding the most important indicators of successful involvement in a life situation and which ones best represent the societal perspective of functioning. In particular, quality of life outcomes lack adequate conceptual frameworks to guide the process of development and validation of measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16040555     DOI: 10.1080/0963828040008552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  32 in total

Review 1.  Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

2.  Measuring participation in people living with multiple sclerosis: a comparison of self-reported frequency, importance and self-efficacy.

Authors:  Kathryn M Yorkston; Carrie M Kuehn; Kurt L Johnson; Dawn M Ehde; Mark P Jensen; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Prediction of long-term mortality in ICU patients: model validation and assessing the effect of using in-hospital versus long-term mortality on benchmarking.

Authors:  Sylvia Brinkman; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Evert de Jonge; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Responsiveness and interpretability of incontinence severity scores and FIQL in patients with fecal incontinence: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E M J Bols; H J M Hendriks; L C M Berghmans; C G M I Baeten; R A de Bie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  How to Measure Recovery? Revisiting Concepts and Methods for Stroke Studies.

Authors:  Marc Hommel; Olivier Detante; Isabelle Favre; Emmanuel Touzé; Assia Jaillard
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Step Test scores are related to measures of activity and participation in the first 6 months after stroke.

Authors:  Vicki Stemmons Mercer; Janet Kues Freburger; Shuo-Hsiu Chang; Jama L Purser
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08-06

7.  Pain acts through fatigue to affect participation in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Shahnaz Shahrbanian; Pierre Duquette; Sara Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Content comparisons of stroke-specific quality of life based upon the international classification of functioning, disability, and health.

Authors:  Luci F Teixeira-Salmela; Mansueto G Neto; Lívia C Magalhães; Renata C Lima; Christina D C M Faria
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Health-related quality of life of stroke survivors attending the volunteer stroke scheme.

Authors:  C Tobin; D Hevey; N F Horgan; R F Coen; C J Cunningham
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 10.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design.

Authors:  Annick A A Timmermans; Henk A M Seelen; Richard D Willmann; Herman Kingma
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.