Literature DB >> 10812317

Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

J A Husted1, R J Cook, V T Farewell, D D Gladman.   

Abstract

A review of the literature suggests there are two major aspects of responsiveness. We define the first as "internal responsiveness," which characterizes the ability of a measure to change over a prespecified time frame, and the second as "external responsiveness, " which reflects the extent to which change in a measure relates to corresponding change in a reference measure of clinical or health status. The properties and interpretation of commonly used internal and external responsiveness statistics are examined. It is from the interpretation point of view that external responsiveness statistics are considered particularly attractive. The usefulness of regression models for assessing external responsiveness is also highlighted.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10812317     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00206-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  358 in total

1.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation.

Authors:  Valerie J Williams; Sara R Piva; James J Irrgang; Chad Crossley; G Kelley Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  A new high-flexion knee scoring system to eliminate the ceiling effect.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Na; Chul-Won Ha; Choong-Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The impact of using different tariffs to value EQ-5D health state descriptions: an example from a study of acute cough/lower respiratory tract infections in seven countries.

Authors:  Raymond Oppong; Billingsley Kaambwa; Jacqueline Nuttall; Kerenza Hood; Richard D Smith; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-11-05

5.  Quality of life after stroke: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  William E Haley; David L Roth; Brett Kissela; Martinique Perkins; George Howard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Responsiveness of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Carl Johan Hedbeck; Jan Tidermark; Sari Ponzer; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunnar Bergström
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Performance of the Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS) for acute asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Benjamin R Saville; Wenli Wang; Tina V Hartert
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 6.347

8.  The physical function intensive care test: implementation in survivors of critical illness.

Authors:  Amy Nordon-Craft; Margaret Schenkman; Lara Edbrooke; Daniel J Malone; Marc Moss; Linda Denehy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-05-08

9.  Responsiveness of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life Scale (AAQoL).

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Joseph A Johnston; Douglas E Faries; Karen G Malley; Meryl Brod
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Improvement in OMERACT domains and renal function with regular treatment for gout: a 12-month follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado; Ingris Peláez-Ballestas; Rubén Burgos-Vargas; Everardo Alvarez-Hernández; Sergio García-Méndez; Virginia Pascual-Ramos; Marina Rull-Gabayet
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.