Literature DB >> 22805682

Improvement of image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage.

Tomohiro Namimoto1, Seitaro Oda, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Toshiaki Shimonobo, Sosuke Morita, Takeshi Nakaura, Yasuyuki Yamashita.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To intraindividually compare a low-tube voltage, low-contrast material dose computed tomography (CT) reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm at standard tube voltage reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and standard-contrast material dose during liver dynamic CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with liver cirrhosis underwent 64-section multidetector CT. One hundred twenty kilovolt (peak) (kV[p]) with standard contrast material dose of 600 mg of iodine per kilogram (protocol A) and 80 kV(p) with low-contrast material dose of 450 mg of iodine per kilogram (protocol B) CT image sets were reconstructed by using FBP algorithm and that of using IR algorithm with a 60%/40% blend of IR-FBP reconstruction at 80-kV(p) image set (protocol C). Scans obtained during 3 hepatic phases were subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis.
RESULTS: The mean radiation dose and the contrast medium dose were significantly lower under protocols B and C than under protocol A. In all hepatic phases, all signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were greater under protocol C than under other protocols at all anatomic sites. Qualitative analysis showed that image noise and diagnostic acceptability were significantly higher under protocol C.
CONCLUSION: In all hepatic phases, a low-tube voltage, low-contrast material dose CT with IR algorithm yielded better contrast enhancement and image quality than a standard tube voltage, standard contrast material dose CT with FBP in thin adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22805682     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825b821f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  9 in total

1.  Aortic CT angiography dose reduction: investigation of optimal noise index and iterative algorithm strength in combination with low kV.

Authors:  Osvaldo Rampado; Stefania Busso; Domenica Garabello; Ezio Marengo; Marco Valerio; Simona Capello; Simona Veglia; Ottavio Davini; Roberto Ropolo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Combining automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction: a liver phantom study.

Authors:  Daniela B Husarik; Sebastian T Schindera; Fabian Morsbach; Natalie Chuck; Burkhardt Seifert; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Using "iDose4" iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults' chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure.

Authors:  I Arapakis; E Efstathopoulos; V Tsitsia; S Kordolaimi; N Economopoulos; S Argentos; A Ploussi; E Alexopoulou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Wei-lan Zhang; Min Li; Bo Zhang; Hai-yang Geng; Yin-qiang Liang; Ke Xu; Song-bai Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Attenuation-based automatic kilovoltage selection and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: effects on radiation exposure and image quality of portal-phase liver CT.

Authors:  Ji Soo Song; Eun Jung Choi; Eun Young Kim; Hyo Sung Kwak; Young Min Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  The Impact of Iterative Reconstruction on Computed Tomography Radiation Dosimetry: Evaluation in a Routine Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Rachael E Moorin; David A J Gibson; Rene K Forsyth; Richard Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Double-low protocol for hepatic dynamic CT scan: Effect of low tube voltage and low-dose iodine contrast agent on image quality.

Authors:  Xiuli Zhang; Shaodong Li; Wenlou Liu; Ning Huang; Jingjing Li; Li Cheng; Kai Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Low-Tube-Voltage CT Urography Using Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media and Iterative Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparison with Conventional CT Urography.

Authors:  Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Joongyub Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Min Hoan Moon; Eun Ju Lee; Seong Sook Hong; Chan Kyo Kim; Kyeong Ah Kim; Sung Bin Park; Deuk Jae Sung; Yongsoo Kim; You Me Kim; Sung Il Jung; Sung Eun Rha; Dong Won Kim; Hyun Lee; Youngsup Shim; Inpyeong Hwang; Sungmin Woo; Hyuck Jae Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Reduction of the radiation dose and the amount of contrast material in hepatic dynamic CT using low tube voltage and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional.

Authors:  Atsushi Nakamoto; Kiyohito Yamamoto; Makoto Sakane; Go Nakai; Akira Higashiyama; Hiroshi Juri; Shushi Yoshikawa; Yoshifumi Narumi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.