Literature DB >> 22798137

The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients.

Klaus A Siebenrock1, Lea Kistler, Joseph M Schwab, Lorenz Büchler, Moritz Tannast.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding acetabular pathomorphology is necessary to correctly treat patients with hip complaints. Existing radiographic parameters classify acetabular coverage as deficient, normal, or excessive but fail to quantify contributions of anterior and posterior wall coverage. A simple, reproducible, and valid measurement of anterior and posterior wall coverage in patients with hip pain would be a clinically useful tool. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) introduce the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI), (2) report the intra- and interobserver reliability of these measurements, and (3) validate these measurements against an established computer model.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 87 hips (63 patients) with symptomatic hip disease. A validated computer model was used to determine total anterior and posterior acetabular coverage (TAC and TPC) on an AP pelvis radiograph. Two independent observers measured the AWI and PWI on each film, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the strength of linear dependence between our measurements and the computer model.
RESULTS: Intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.94 and 0.99 for the AWI and 0.81 and 0.97 for the PWI. For validation against the computer model, Pearson r values were 0.837 (AWI versus TAC) and 0.895 (PWI versus TPC). Mean AWI and PWI were 0.28 and 0.81 for dysplastic hips, 0.41 and 0.91 for normal hips, 0.61 and 1.15 for hips with a deep acetabulum.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest these measures will be helpful in evaluating anterior and posterior coverage before and after surgery but need to be evaluated in asymptomatic individuals without hip abnormalities to establish normal ranges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22798137      PMCID: PMC3492620          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2477-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain.

Authors:  D Reynolds; J Lucas; K Klaue
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

2.  Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; R Schoeniger; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery.

Authors:  Aimee C Perreira; John C Hunter; Thaddeus Laird; Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Simplified 3D-evaluation of periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  M Dutoit; P Y Zambelli
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Determination of acetabular coverage of the femoral head with use of a single anteroposterior radiograph. A new computerized technique.

Authors:  N Konishi; T Mieno
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Spherical assessment of the hip on standard AP radiographs: a simple method for the measurement of the contact area between acetabulum and femoral head and of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  F Hefti
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia.

Authors:  J W Mast; R L Brunner; J Zebrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Nicholas J Giori; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  38 in total

1.  What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Markus S Hanke; Guoyan Zheng; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Compensatory Anterior Pelvic Tilt Decrease After Bilateral Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  Erika Daley; Nickolas Nahm; Denise Koueiter; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT.

Authors:  Benjamin Fritz; Christoph A Agten; Franca K Boldt; Patrick O Zingg; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Reto Sutter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Sex- and age-specific differences in femoral head coverage and acetabular morphology among healthy subjects-derivation of normal ranges and thresholds for abnormality.

Authors:  Dai Miyasaka; Yoshinori Sakai; Shinya Ibuchi; Hayato Suzuki; Norio Imai; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  What Is the Reliability and Accuracy of Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in Evaluating Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Coverage During Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  James D Wylie; Mariana G Ferrer; Michael P McClincy; Patricia E Miller; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Periacetabular osteotomy: a review of swiss experience.

Authors:  Lorenz Büchler; Martin Beck
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-12

7.  CORR Insights®: Acetabular Wall Indices Help to Distinguish Acetabular Coverage in Asymptomatic Adults with Varying Morphologies.

Authors:  Nicolás S Piuzzi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Evaluation and Treatment of Borderline Dysplasia: Moving Beyond the Lateral Center Edge Angle.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Michael P McClincy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

9.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?

Authors:  Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular Wall Indices Help to Distinguish Acetabular Coverage in Asymptomatic Adults With Varying Morphologies.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Mike B Anderson; Jill A Erickson; Jesse Chrastil; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.