Literature DB >> 10546351

Simplified 3D-evaluation of periacetabular osteotomy.

M Dutoit1, P Y Zambelli.   

Abstract

Reorientation osteotomies are widely used for the treatment of residual dysplasia of the hip. Preoperative planning is mandatory, and 3D-evaluation is of utmost importance for precise definition of direction and magnitude of displacement of the acetabulum. Instead of a 3D-CT scan reconstruction which needs multiple slices, we developed a 3D-reconstruction from a single AP pelvic view. This method is applicable if we accept that the femoral head and acetabulum are quite spherical. Appropriate software and a PC are used for this reconstruction that we compared with 3D CT-scan reconstruction and pelvic anatomical preparations. Twenty-two patients, 17 female, 5 male, with hip dysplasia, were treated by periacetabular osteotomy according to Ganz. The mean age was 27 years (14-40 years); the mean follow-up, 4.8 years (2-7 years). Four patients were treated conservatively in infancy for DDH, one patient had snapping hips associated with hip dysplasia, and two patients had slight sequellae of cerebral palsy. All patients were symptomatic mainly during daily activities or sports. The clinical evaluation was done using the Charnley scoring system. The Charnley score for pain improved from 3.6 (2-3.5) to 5.8 (5-6) at follow-up. No restriction of mobility or of walking capacity was observed after operation. The computer-assisted method also permits appreciation of the evolution of classical coxometry; i.e. Wiberg and Lequesne angles. The improvement after Ganz osteotomy was respectively 141% and 161% for Wiberg and Lequesne angles without any posterior uncoverage. The 3D-evaluation showed an improvement of 28% of the vertical projection area of the acetabulum on the femoral head. The anterolateral coverage improved from 20.3 to 50.1%. The Ganz osteotomy is really a 3D-reorientation osteotomy. With our simplified method it is possible to predict and control the amount of displacement to be done. However, we have to keep in mind that the articular cartilage is a limited crescent in the acetabulum; this method cannot replicate exactly the form and shape of articular cartilage. At this time it allows us to better control the amount of displacement during operation to avoid too large a displacement or lateralization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of rotational acetabular osteotomy performed with navigation by surgeons with different levels of experience of osteotomies.

Authors:  Masaki Takao; Takashi Nishii; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  3D-printed model improves clinical assessment of surgeons on anatomy.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xiaolin Wang; Yixiong Zheng; Jiexiong Feng
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-04-24

3.  The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Klaus A Siebenrock; Lea Kistler; Joseph M Schwab; Lorenz Büchler; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Acetabular Wall Index Is Associated with Long-term Conversion to THA after PAO.

Authors:  Vera M Stetzelberger; Christiane S Leibold; Simon D Steppacher; Joseph M Schwab; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Preoperative planning for redirective, periacetabular osteotomies.

Authors:  Christoph E Albers; Piet Rogers; Nicholas Wambeek; Sufian S Ahmad; Piers J Yates; Gareth H Prosser
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  Evaluation of Constant Thickness Cartilage Models vs. Patient Specific Cartilage Models for an Optimized Computer-Assisted Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Li Liu; Timo Michael Ecker; Steffen Schumann; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.