Literature DB >> 22795931

Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and pharmacokinetic modeling considerations in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Xin Li1, Wei Huang, William D Rooney.   

Abstract

With advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI is approaching the capability to simultaneously deliver both high spatial and high temporal resolutions for clinical applications. However, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) considerations and their impacts regarding pharmacokinetic modeling of the time-course data continue to represent challenges in the design of DCE-MRI acquisitions. Given that many acquisition parameters can affect the nature of DCE-MRI data, minimizing tissue-specific data acquisition discrepancy (among sites and scanner models) is as important as synchronizing pharmacokinetic modeling approaches. For cancer-related DCE-MRI studies where rapid contrast reagent (CR) extravasation is expected, current DCE-MRI protocols often adopt a three-dimensional fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence to achieve spatial-temporal resolution requirements. Based on breast and prostate DCE-MRI data acquired with different FLASH sequence parameters, this paper elucidates a number of SNR and CNR considerations for acquisition optimization and pharmacokinetic modeling implications therein. Simulations based on region of interest data further indicate that the effects of intercompartmental water exchange often play an important role in DCE time-course data modeling, especially for protocols optimized for post-CR SNR.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795931      PMCID: PMC3532862          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  23 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL.

Authors:  Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Bruce Daniel; Huanzhou Yu; Anne Sawyer-Glover; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; W J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays.

Authors:  C D Constantinides; E Atalar; E R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Noise in MRI.

Authors:  A Macovski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Improving MR quantification of regional blood volume with intravascular T1 contrast agents: accuracy, precision, and water exchange.

Authors:  K M Donahue; R M Weisskoff; D A Chesler; K K Kwong; A A Bogdanov; J B Mandeville; B R Rosen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A signal-to-noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems.

Authors:  W A Edelstein; P A Bottomley; L M Pfeifer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Fast and quiet MRI using a swept radiofrequency.

Authors:  Djaudat Idiyatullin; Curt Corum; Jang-Yeon Park; Michael Garwood
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  22 in total

1.  Observation of Reduced Homeostatic Metabolic Activity and/or Coupling in White Matter Aging.

Authors:  Valerie C Anderson; Ian J Tagge; Xin Li; Joseph F Quinn; Jeffrey A Kaye; Dennis N Bourdette; Rebecca I Spain; Louis P Riccelli; Manoj K Sammi; Charles S Springer; William D Rooney
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Water exchange-minimizing DCE-MRI protocol to detect changes in tumor vascular parameters: effect of bevacizumab/paclitaxel combination therapy.

Authors:  Wenlian Zhu; Yoshinori Kato; Dmitri Artemov
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Quantitative effects of acquisition duration and temporal resolution on the measurement accuracy of prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data: a phantom study.

Authors:  Silvin Paul Knight; Jacinta Elizabeth Browne; James Frances Mary Meaney; Andrew John Fagan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Study of proximal femoral bone perfusion with 3D T1 dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Guillaume Lefebvre; Gerard Forzy; Mazen El Rafei; David Chechin; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Robust and efficient pharmacokinetic parameter non-linear least squares estimation for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate.

Authors:  Soudabeh Kargar; Eric A Borisch; Adam T Froemming; Akira Kawashima; Lance A Mynderse; Eric G Stinson; Joshua D Trzasko; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Robert Toth; Wendy van de Ven; Caroline Hoeks; Sjoerd Kerkstra; Bram van Ginneken; Graham Vincent; Gwenael Guillard; Neil Birbeck; Jindang Zhang; Robin Strand; Filip Malmberg; Yangming Ou; Christos Davatzikos; Matthias Kirschner; Florian Jung; Jing Yuan; Wu Qiu; Qinquan Gao; Philip Eddie Edwards; Bianca Maan; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Soumya Ghose; Jhimli Mitra; Jason Dowling; Dean Barratt; Henkjan Huisman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Combined blood pool and extracellular contrast agents for pediatric and young adult cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joyce T Johnson; Joshua D Robinson; Jie Deng; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30

8.  Comparison of ferumoxytol- and gadolinium chelate-enhanced MRI for assessment of sarcomas in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Florian Siedek; Anne M Muehe; Ashok J Theruvath; Raffi Avedian; Allison Pribnow; Sheri L Spunt; Tie Liang; Crystal Farrell; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the accurate, extensive quantification of microvascular permeability in atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Mark E Lobatto; Hadrien Dyvorne; Philip M Robson; Antoine Millon; Max L Senders; Olivier Lairez; Sarayu Ramachandran; Bram F Coolen; Alexandra Black; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.