Florian Siedek1,2, Anne M Muehe1, Ashok J Theruvath1,3, Raffi Avedian4, Allison Pribnow5, Sheri L Spunt5, Tie Liang1, Crystal Farrell1, Heike E Daldrup-Link6,7. 1. Department of Radiology, Pediatric Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (PedsMIPS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Pediatric Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (PedsMIPS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. heiked@stanford.edu. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. heiked@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We compared the value of ferumoxytol (FMX)- and gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced MRI for assessment of sarcomas in paediatric/adolescent patients and hypothesised that tumour size and morphological features can be equally well assessed with both protocols. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of paediatric/adolescent patients with newly diagnosed bone or soft tissue sarcomas and both pre-treatment FMX- and Gd-MRI scans, which were maximal 4 weeks apart. Both protocols included T1- and T2-weighted sequences. One reader assessed tumour volumes, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the primary tumour and adjacent tissues and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of FMX- and Gd-MRI scans. Additionally, four readers scored FMX- and Gd-MRI scans according to 15 diagnostic parameters, using a Likert scale. The results were pooled across readers and compared between FMX- and Gd-MRI scans. Statistical methods included multivariate analyses with different models. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria (16 males, 6 females; mean age 15.3 ± 5.0). Tumour volume was not significantly different on T1-LAVA (p = 0.721), T1-SE (p = 0.290) and T2-FSE (p = 0.609) sequences. Compared to Gd-MRI, FMX-MRI demonstrated significantly lower tumour SNR on T1-LAVA (p < 0.001), equal tumour SNR on T1-SE (p = 0.104) and T2-FSE (p = 0.305), significantly higher tumour-to-marrow CNR (p < 0.001) on T2-FSE as well as significantly higher tumour-to-liver (p = 0.021) and tumour-to-vessel (p = 0.003) CNR on T1-LAVA images. Peritumoural and marrow oedema enhanced significantly more on Gd-MRI compared to FMX-MRI (p < 0.001/p = 0.002, respectively). Tumour thrombi and neurovascular bundle involvement were assessed with a significantly higher confidence on FMX-MRI (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FMX-MRI provides equal assessment of the extent of bone and soft tissue sarcomas compared to Gd-MRI with improved tumour delineation and improved evaluation of neurovascular involvement and tumour thrombi. Therefore, FMX-MRI is a possible alternative to Gd-MRI for tumour staging in paediatric/adolescent sarcoma patients. KEY POINTS: • Ferumoxytol can be used as an alterative to gadolinium chelates for MRI staging ofpaediatric sarcomas. • Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI provides equal assessment of tumour size and other diagnostic parameters compared to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MRI. • Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI provides improved delineation of sarcomas from bone marrow, liver and vessels compared to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MRI.
OBJECTIVES: We compared the value of ferumoxytol (FMX)- and gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced MRI for assessment of sarcomas in paediatric/adolescent patients and hypothesised that tumour size and morphological features can be equally well assessed with both protocols. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of paediatric/adolescent patients with newly diagnosed bone or soft tissue sarcomas and both pre-treatment FMX- and Gd-MRI scans, which were maximal 4 weeks apart. Both protocols included T1- and T2-weighted sequences. One reader assessed tumour volumes, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the primary tumour and adjacent tissues and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of FMX- and Gd-MRI scans. Additionally, four readers scored FMX- and Gd-MRI scans according to 15 diagnostic parameters, using a Likert scale. The results were pooled across readers and compared between FMX- and Gd-MRI scans. Statistical methods included multivariate analyses with different models. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria (16 males, 6 females; mean age 15.3 ± 5.0). Tumour volume was not significantly different on T1-LAVA (p = 0.721), T1-SE (p = 0.290) and T2-FSE (p = 0.609) sequences. Compared to Gd-MRI, FMX-MRI demonstrated significantly lower tumour SNR on T1-LAVA (p < 0.001), equal tumour SNR on T1-SE (p = 0.104) and T2-FSE (p = 0.305), significantly higher tumour-to-marrow CNR (p < 0.001) on T2-FSE as well as significantly higher tumour-to-liver (p = 0.021) and tumour-to-vessel (p = 0.003) CNR on T1-LAVA images. Peritumoural and marrow oedema enhanced significantly more on Gd-MRI compared to FMX-MRI (p < 0.001/p = 0.002, respectively). Tumour thrombi and neurovascular bundle involvement were assessed with a significantly higher confidence on FMX-MRI (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:FMX-MRI provides equal assessment of the extent of bone and soft tissue sarcomas compared to Gd-MRI with improved tumour delineation and improved evaluation of neurovascular involvement and tumour thrombi. Therefore, FMX-MRI is a possible alternative to Gd-MRI for tumour staging in paediatric/adolescent sarcomapatients. KEY POINTS: • Ferumoxytol can be used as an alterative to gadolinium chelates for MRI staging ofpaediatric sarcomas. • Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI provides equal assessment of tumour size and other diagnostic parameters compared to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MRI. • Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI provides improved delineation of sarcomas from bone marrow, liver and vessels compared to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MRI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ferumoxytol; Gadolinium; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nanoparticles; Sarcomas
Authors: Wei Li; Sean Tutton; Anthony T Vu; Linda Pierchala; Belinda S Y Li; Jerome M Lewis; Pottumarthi V Prasad; Robert R Edelman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Csanad G Varallyay; Eric Nesbit; Rongwei Fu; Seymur Gahramanov; Brendan Moloney; Eric Earl; Leslie L Muldoon; Xin Li; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Pippa Storey; Ruth P Lim; Hersh Chandarana; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Daniel Kim; David R Stoffel; Vivian S Lee Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Seymur Gahramanov; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad G Varallyay; Xin Li; Dale F Kraemer; Rongwei Fu; Bronwyn E Hamilton; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ashok J Theruvath; Florian Siedek; Anne M Muehe; Jordi Garcia-Diaz; Julian Kirchner; Ole Martin; Michael P Link; Sheri Spunt; Allison Pribnow; Jarrett Rosenberg; Ken Herrmann; Sergios Gatidis; Jürgen F Schäfer; Michael Moseley; Lale Umutlu; Heike E Daldrup-Link Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ashok J Theruvath; Ali Rashidi; Ramya R Nyalakonda; Raffi S Avedian; Robert J Steffner; Sheri L Spunt; Heike E Daldrup-Link Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-08-19
Authors: Thomas Abraham; Christopher O McGovern; Samuel S Linton; Zachary Wilczynski; James H Adair; Gail L Matters Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: Heike E Daldrup-Link; Ashok J Theruvath; Ali Rashidi; Michael Iv; Robbie G Majzner; Sheri L Spunt; Stuart Goodman; Michael Moseley Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-05-27