Literature DB >> 22786703

Human neural systems underlying rigid and flexible forms of allocentric spatial representation.

Hui Zhang1, Arne Ekstrom.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest the importance of medial temporal lobe, areas of parietal cortex, and retrosplenial cortex in human spatial navigation, though the exact role of these structures in representing the relations of elements within a spatial layout ("allocentric" representation) remains unresolved. Hippocampal involvement, in particular, during memory processing is affected by whether a previously formed representation is employed in a novel fashion ("flexible" usage) or in a manner comparable with how it was encoded originally ("rigid" usage). To address whether brain systems are differentially involved during flexible vs. rigid utilization of a pre-existing allocentric representation, subjects encoded the position of six different target buildings relative to a centrally located landmark building in a virtual city seen from an aerial view. They then actively searched for the locations of these target buildings using the landmark (rigid retrieval) or using a previously shown target building in a novel fashion (flexible retrieval) while undergoing fMRI. Activations in posterior superior parietal cortex and precuneus were greater during more rigid than flexible forms of allocentric retrieval while activation in the hippocampus decreased linearly over blocks during flexible allocentric retrieval. A functional connectivity analysis further revealed significant interactions between hippocampus and these parietal areas during flexible compared with rigid allocentric retrieval. These results extend previous models of the neural basis of spatial navigation by suggesting that while the posterior superior parietal cortex/precuneus play an important role in allocentric representation, the hippocampus, and interactions between hippocampus and these parietal areas, are important for flexible utilization of these representations.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22786703      PMCID: PMC6870227          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  78 in total

1.  Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  Russell Epstein; Kim S Graham; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Orientation specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of the path?

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Learning your way around town: how virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information.

Authors:  Ehren L Newman; Jeremy B Caplan; Matthew P Kirschen; Igor O Korolev; Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-08-01

4.  Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; J Stephen Higgins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Spatial memory deficits in a virtual radial arm maze in amnesic participants with hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Ramona O Hopkins
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Cognitive maps as orienting schemata.

Authors:  M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  "I have often walked down this street before": fMRI studies on the hippocampus and other structures during mental navigation of an old environment.

Authors:  R Shayna Rosenbaum; Marilyne Ziegler; Gordon Winocur; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Dynamics of the hippocampus during encoding and retrieval of face-name pairs.

Authors:  Michael M Zeineh; Stephen A Engel; Paul M Thompson; Susan Y Bookheimer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mind the gap: binding experiences across space and time in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Bernhard P Staresina; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space.

Authors:  Timothy P McNamara; Björn Rump; Steffen Werner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09
View more
  29 in total

1.  Increased functional connectivity between superior colliculus and brain regions implicated in bodily self-consciousness during the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Isadora Olivé; Claus Tempelmann; Alain Berthoz; Hans-Joachim Heinze
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cortical Hemodynamic Response Associated with Spatial Coding: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

Authors:  Abiot Y Derbie; Bolton Chau; Bess Lam; Yun-Hua Fang; Kin-Hung Ting; Clive Y H Wong; Jing Tao; Li-Dian Chen; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Scene representations in parahippocampal cortex depend on temporal context.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Mason G Simon; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Navigating life.

Authors:  Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  The limits of boundaries: unpacking localization and cognitive mapping relative to a boundary.

Authors:  Ruojing Zhou; Weimin Mou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 6.  Multifaceted roles for low-frequency oscillations in bottom-up and top-down processing during navigation and memory.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom; Andrew J Watrous
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Roles of human hippocampal subfields in retrieval of spatial and temporal context.

Authors:  Colin T Kyle; Dana N Smuda; Abdul S Hassan; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Why vision is important to how we navigate.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Close but no cigar: Spatial precision deficits following medial temporal lobe lesions provide novel insight into theoretical models of navigation and memory.

Authors:  Branden S Kolarik; Trevor Baer; Kiarash Shahlaie; Andrew P Yonelinas; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 10.  The hippocampus supports high-resolution binding in the service of perception, working memory and long-term memory.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.