Literature DB >> 33484379

Cortical Hemodynamic Response Associated with Spatial Coding: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

Abiot Y Derbie1,2, Bolton Chau1, Bess Lam1, Yun-Hua Fang3, Kin-Hung Ting4, Clive Y H Wong1,5, Jing Tao3, Li-Dian Chen3, Chetwyn C H Chan6,7.   

Abstract

Allocentric and egocentric are two types of spatial coding. Previous studies reported the dorsal attention network's involvement in both types. To eliminate possible paradigm-specific confounds in the results, this study employed fine-grained cue-to-target paradigm to dissociate allocentric (aSC) and egocentric (eSC) spatial coding. Twenty-two participants completed a custom visuospatial task, and changes in the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (O2-Hb) were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized principal component (LASSO-RPC) algorithm was used to identify cortical sites that predicted the aSC and eSC conditions' reaction times. Significant changes in O2-Hb concentration in the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and post-central gyrus regions were common in both aSC and eSC. Results of inter-channel correlations further substantiate cortical activities in both conditions were predominantly over the right parieto-frontal areas. Together with right superior frontal gyrus areas be the reaction time neural correlates, the results suggest top-down attention and response-mapping processes are common to both spatial coding types. Changes unique to aSC were in clusters over the right intraparietal sulcus, right temporo-parietal junction, and left IPL. With the left pre-central gyrus region, be the reaction time neural correlate, aSC is likely to involve more orienting attention, updating of spatial information, and object-based response selection and inhibition than eSC. Future studies will use other visuospatial task designs for testing the robustness of the findings on spatial coding processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocentric spatial coding; Attention; Egocentric spatial coding; Fnirs; Frames of reference; IPL; SFG; Top-down attention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33484379     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-021-00821-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  63 in total

1.  Coding space within but not between objects: evidence from Balint's syndrome.

Authors:  A C Cooper; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Neural interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame in parietal-occipital junction.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Ralph Weidner; Peter H Weiss; John C Marshall; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reference frames for spatial cognition: different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgments about object location.

Authors:  Giorgia Committeri; Gaspare Galati; Anne-Lise Paradis; Luigi Pizzamiglio; Alain Berthoz; Denis LeBihan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Spatial cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Julie D Golomb; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 6.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  The neuroscience of grasping.

Authors:  Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames in aging: A systematic review.

Authors:  Desirée Colombo; Silvia Serino; Cosimo Tuena; Elisa Pedroli; Antonios Dakanalis; Pietro Cipresso; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The neural basis of monitoring goal progress.

Authors:  Yael Benn; Thomas L Webb; Betty P I Chang; Yu-Hsuan Sun; Iain D Wilkinson; Tom F D Farrow
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Functional and Structural Architectures of Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Coding in Aging: A Combined DTI and fMRI Study.

Authors:  Abiot Y Derbie; Bolton K H Chau; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.