Literature DB >> 22782378

An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices.

Ofir Chechik1, Eyal Amar, Morsi Khashan, Ran Lador, Gil Eyal, Aviram Gold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografting fixed with metal interference screws (IS) is the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Advances in surgical technology provide a wide choice of grafts, fixation devices and surgical approaches.
METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty-one orthopedic surgeons of ten subspecialties from 57 countries were surveyed on their choice of graft and fixation device, the number of reconstructed bundles, and arthroscopic portal. Their preferences were analyzed according to country of origin, field of expertise and seniority, and compared to current publications.
RESULTS: Hamstring autografting was the most popular choice (63 %), then BPTB (26 %) and allograft (11 %). The anteromedial portal was preferred over the traditional transtibial portal (68 % versus 31 %). Two-thirds reported routinely performing a single-bundle graft reconstruction, compared to one-third who used the double-bundle technique. The Endo-button was the most common graft fixation method (40 %), followed by the bioabsorbable IS (34 %), metallic IS (12 %), rigidfix (10 %) and others (4 %). The preferences of hamstring tendon grafting and the anteromedial portal are not supported in the literature. Responses from North American and European surgeons were different from all the others.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon preferences in ACL reconstruction differ considerably worldwide. Common practice is not always supported by evidence-based publications.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22782378      PMCID: PMC3560905          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1611-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  26 in total

1.  Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrea L Bowers; Asheesh Bedi; Joseph D Lipman; Hollis G Potter; Scott A Rodeo; Andrew D Pearle; Russell F Warren; David W Altchek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Jeffrey D Jackson; Tanya L Hoskin; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Steven B Cohen; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Baer; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 6.  Bone-patella tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert J Schoderbek; Gehron P Treme; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 7.  Biomechanics of intratunnel anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation.

Authors:  Neal C Chen; Jeff C Brand; Charles H Brown
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 8.  Peripheral versus aperture fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael J Elliott; Christopher A Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 9.  Principles for using hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Keith W Lawhorn; Stephen M Howell
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

10.  Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.

Authors:  B S Delay; R J Smolinski; W M Wind; D S Bowman
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  2001
View more
  49 in total

1.  Knee stability, athletic performance and sport-specific tasks in non-professional soccer players after ACL reconstruction: comparing trans-tibial and antero-medial portal techniques.

Authors:  Cosimo Tudisco; Salvatore Bisicchia; Andrea Cosentino; Federica Chiozzi; Massimo Piva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

2.  In vivo evaluation of the bone integration of coated poly(vinyl-alcohol) hydrogel fiber implants.

Authors:  David Moreau; Arthur Villain; Manon Bachy; Henry Proudhon; David N Ku; Didier Hannouche; Hervé Petite; Laurent Corté
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS™ artificial ligament results at a mean follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Ciapini Gianluca; Lorenzo Dolfi; Alessandro Baluganti; Piolanti Nicola; Fabio Chiellini; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Predicting adequacy of free quadriceps tendon autograft, for primary and revision ACL reconstruction, from patients' physical parameters.

Authors:  Anthony Ugwuoke; Farhan Syed; Sam El-Kawy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyung-Han Ro; Hyun-Jung Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  An Liu; Miao Sun; Chiyuan Ma; Yunlin Chen; Xinghe Xue; Peng Guo; Zhongli Shi; Shigui Yan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparison of femur tunnel aperture location in patients undergoing transtibial and anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Hyun-Jung Kim; Hyeong-Sik Ahn; Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A comparison of three adjustable cortical button ACL fixation devices.

Authors:  Meghan Pasquali; Matthew J Plante; Keith O Monchik; David B Spenciner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how do we perform it? Brazilian orthopedic surgeons' preference.

Authors:  Luiz Felipe Morlin Ambra; Fernando Cury Rezende; Bruno Xavier; Felipe Conrado Shumaker; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; Marcos Vinicius Malheiros Luzo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Stress distribution is deviated around the aperture of the femoral tunnel in the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Naoki Nakano; Kanto Nagai; Daisuke Araki; Shinya Oka; Shogo Kawaguchi; Kouki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.