Literature DB >> 26197939

A comparison of three adjustable cortical button ACL fixation devices.

Meghan Pasquali1, Matthew J Plante2, Keith O Monchik2, David B Spenciner3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adjustable cortical fixation has gained popularity recently for ACL reconstruction; however, one concern with these types of devices is the potential for laxity occurring post-operatively. An indicator of clinical laxity is cyclic displacement during bench-top mechanical testing. The hypothesis was that the cyclic displacement and maximum strength of different adjustable buttons currently on the market would vary depending on their mechanism of fixation.
METHODS: Three devices were studied: Biomet's ToggleLoc with ZipLoop Technology (ZL), Arthrex's TightRope RT (TR), and DePuy Mitek's RIGIDLOOP Adjustable (RLA). Each was tested in isolation on a servohydraulic test machine. The implants were pre-conditioned from 5 to 67 N for 10 cycles and then tested from 50 to 250 N for 1000 cycles at 1 Hz. Following cyclic loading, a load to failure test was conducted at a rate of 20 mm/min. Total displacement was calculated from the 1st to the 1000th cycle, and ultimate strength and failure mode were recorded.
RESULTS: Results showed that the RLA had significantly lower displacement versus both the TR (p = 0.012) and the ZL (p < 0.001). The TR also showed significantly lower displacement than the ZL (p < 0.001). The RLA and the ZL were both significantly stronger than the TR (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the RLA and TR showed clinically acceptable amounts of cyclic displacement and maximum strength. The clinical relevance of this study is that cyclic displacement results from bench-top tests may correlate with post-operative laxity, which ideally should be kept to a minimum.

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Adjustable cortical button; Cortical fixation; Cyclic displacement; Laxity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26197939     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3711-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  14 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical considerations for rehabilitation of the knee.

Authors:  G McGinty; J J Irrgang; D Pezzullo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Benjaminse; Alli Gokeler; Cees P van der Schans
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment.

Authors:  M A Kessler; H Behrend; S Henz; G Stutz; A Rukavina; M S Kuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A biomechanical comparison of femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under high loads.

Authors:  Jared S Johnson; Sean D Smith; Christopher M LaPrade; Travis Lee Turnbull; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Benjamin M Petre; Sean D Smith; Kyle S Jansson; Peter-Paul de Meijer; Thomas R Hackett; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Mechanical properties of suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the fixed-length loop device versus the adjustable-length loop device.

Authors:  Akio Eguchi; Mitsuo Ochi; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Atsuo Nakamae; Muhammad Andry Usman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M Kurosaka; S Yoshiya; J T Andrish
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Load and length changes in an artificial ligament substitute. 10 cases of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J Gillquist; L Good
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-10

10.  Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study.

Authors:  D M Daniel; M L Stone; B E Dobson; D C Fithian; D J Rossman; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  9 in total

1.  Adjustable buttons for ACL graft cortical fixation partially fail with cyclic loading and unloading.

Authors:  J Glasbrenner; C Domnick; M J Raschke; T Willinghöfer; C Kittl; P Michel; D Wähnert; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Adjustable loop ACL suspension devices demonstrate less reliability in terms of reproducibility and irreversible displacement.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Michael T Hirschmann; Benjamin Voumard; Sandro Kohl; Philippe Zysset; Takura Mukabeta; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Atesch Ateschrang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Evaluation of Tibial Fixation Devices for Quadrupled Hamstring ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Elias Ammann; Andreas Hecker; Elias Bachmann; Jess G Snedeker; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-11

4.  Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryo Iuchi; Tatsuo Mae; Yuta Tachibana; Konsei Shino; Shigeto Nakagawa; Hideki Yoshikawa; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  Biomechanical properties of adjustable extracortical graft fixations in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  M Ettinger; R Karkosch; H Horstmann; P Savov; T Calliess; T Smith; M Petri
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-09-29

6.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Loop Retention Mechanism for Cortical Graft Fixation in ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Tobias Götschi; George Rosenberg; Xiang Li; Chen Zhang; Elias Bachmann; Jess G Snedeker; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-25

7.  Continuous-Loop Tape Technique Has Greater Stiffness and Less Elongation Compared With Tied-Suture Fixation of Full-Thickness All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autografts.

Authors:  Christopher M Gibbs; Philipp W Winkler; Robert T Tisherman; Calvin K Chan; Theresa A Diermeier; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 8.  Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarvpreet Singh; Shalin Shaunak; Sebastian C K Shaw; John L Anderson; Vipul Mandalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Post-Operative Results of ACL Reconstruction Techniques on Single-Leg Hop Tests in Athletes: Hamstring Autograft vs. Hamstring Grafts Fixed Using Adjustable Cortical Suspension in Both the Femur and Tibia.

Authors:  Lokman Kehribar; Ali Kerim Yılmaz; Emre Karaduman; Menderes Kabadayı; Özgür Bostancı; Serkan Sürücü; Mahmud Aydın; Mahir Mahiroğulları
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.