Literature DB >> 17920959

Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Geoffrey S Baer1, Christopher D Harner.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are the most common complete ligamentous injury to the knee. The optimal graft should be able to reproduce the anatomy and biomechanics of the ACL, be incorporated rapidly with strong initial fixation, and cause low graft-site morbidity. This article reviews the literature comparing the clinical outcomes following allograft and autograft ACL reconstruction and examines current issues regarding graft choice.

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17920959     DOI： 10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sports Med        ISSN： 0278-5919            Impact factor:   2.182


  32 in total

1.  Effect of implanting a soft tissue autograft in a central-third patellar tendon defect: biomechanical and histological comparisons.

Authors:  Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Marc T Galloway; David L Butler; Jason T Shearn
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices.

Authors:  Ofir Chechik; Eyal Amar; Morsi Khashan; Ran Lador; Gil Eyal; Aviram Gold
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 4.  The concept of individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; B Muller; C D Murawski; C F van Eck; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Allografts for cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  S Buchmann; V Musahl; A B Imhoff; P U Brucker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft.

Authors:  James L Carey; Warren R Dunn; Diane L Dahm; Scott L Zeger; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.

Authors:  Erin H Hartigan; Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Terese L Chmielewski; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 8.  Tendon tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and translation to the clinic.

Authors:  J T Shearn; K R Kinneberg; N A Dyment; M T Galloway; K Kenter; C Wylie; D L Butler
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 9.  Patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Wei Yao; Qi Wang; Liang Zhang; Chao Zhang; Bin Zhang; Yan-Jun Zhang; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-16

10.  Revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus allograft: intermediate-term outcome.

Authors:  S Chougule; G Tselentakis; Stefania Stefan; Georgeos Stefanakis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.