Literature DB >> 22782366

Three-year results of randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty.

C Nikkolo1, M Murruste, T Vaasna, H Seepter, T Tikk, U Lepner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present randomised study was to find out whether usage of lightweight mesh in inguinal hernia repair, compared with heavyweight mesh, results in decreased incidence of chronic groin pain and foreign body feeling, as well as to evaluate the risk factors for chronic pain development and hernia recurrences.
METHODS: The patients were randomised into the heavyweight mesh (HW) group and lightweight mesh (LW) group. A tension-free mesh repair using the Lichtenstein technique was performed on all patients. Pain scores during different activities were measured on visual analogue scale. All patients underwent a clinical examination for any evidence of hernia recurrence.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 17.2 % in the HW group and 29.3 % in the LW group reported that they experienced pain at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.1323). Pain was most often reported during physical activity. The median VAS score of all studied activities was 30.5 in the HW group and 30.0 in the LW group. There were more patients in the HW group than in the LW group who stated that they could feel the mesh in the groin (27.6 vs. 20.7 %, P = 0.3967). Among all patients, 42.9 % who had severe pain preoperatively also reported pain during different activities and 19.6 % of the patients who did not have severe pain preoperatively reported pain during different activities (P = 0.0481). At 3-year follow-up, there was 1 hernia recurrence in the HW group and 1 hernia recurrence in the LW group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that compared with HW mesh, LW mesh has no advantage in reducing chronic groin pain and foreign body feeling at the operation site after inguinal hernioplasty at 3-year follow-up. Severe preoperative pain was correlated with the development of chronic pain. There was no difference between the two study groups in the recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22782366     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0951-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  11 in total

1.  Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; M Müller; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-07

Review 2.  Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  M śmietański
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  S Alfieri; P K Amid; G Campanelli; G Izard; H Kehlet; A R Wijsmuller; D Di Miceli; G B Doglietto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II-mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

Authors:  S Bringman; S Wollert; J Osterberg; S Smedberg; H Granlund; G Felländer; T Heikkinen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  A Koch; S Bringman; P Myrelid; S Smeds; A Kald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  C Nikkolo; U Lepner; M Murruste; T Vaasna; H Seepter; T Tikk
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  S Post; B Weiss; M Willer; T Neufang; D Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  11 in total

1.  A randomized clinical study on postoperative pain comparing the Polysoft patch to the modified Kugel patch for transinguinal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Kota Okinaga; Takashi Hori; Tsuyoshi Inaba; Kazue Yamaoka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Preventing inguinodynia after hernia surgery: does the type of mesh matter?

Authors:  Nehal Sureshkumar Shah; Aali Sheen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  Ping Sun; Xiang Cheng; Shichang Deng; Qinggang Hu; Yi Sun; Qichang Zheng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  Crossing mesh tails in the Lichtenstein repair method for medial (direct) inguinal hernia: recurrence and chronic pain rates after five years.

Authors:  A Sahin; E Ölcucuoglu; H Kulacoglu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight vs heavyweight mesh (Supermesh Study).

Authors:  Stefano Bona; Riccardo Rosati; Enrico Opocher; Barbara Fiore; Marco Montorsi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-08-08

6.  Prospective study evaluating the impact of severity of chronic pain on quality of life after inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  C Nikkolo; Ü Kirsimägi; T Vaasna; M Murruste; J Suumann; H Seepter; U Lepner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M Miserez; E Peeters; T Aufenacker; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; L N Jorgensen; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Is chronic post-herniorrhaphy pain always chronic? A literature review.

Authors:  Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.