Literature DB >> 10452261

Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias.

U Klinge1, B Klosterhalfen, M Müller, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the local tissue reactions to meshes that had been removed from humans.
DESIGN: Open study
SETTING: Surgical department of the technical University, Aachen, Germany. MATERIAL: Samples of 17 non-absorbable meshes (1 polyester, 10 polypropylene, 2 reduced polypropylene, and 4 polytetrafluorethylene, PTFE) and 1 absorbable mesh (polyglactin 910) that had been implanted for repair of abdominal wall defects.
INTERVENTIONS: Light and transmission electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and histological examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Signs of inflammatory response.
RESULTS: Light microscopy showed chronic inflammatory tissue reaction, even after years, with pronounced differences among materials. Partial volume of inflammatory cells (%) varied from 32 in polypropylene, to 12 in expanded PTFE, 8 in polyester, and 7 in reduced polypropylene. Formation of connective tissue correlated significantly with the extent of the inflammatory reaction (p<0.01). In meshes implanted for long periods there were still numerous macrophages at the interface between tissue and polypropylene (45%), polyester (45%), expanded PTFE (25%), and reduced polypropylene (22%). There was no difference in time dependent tissue reactions (p = 0.19).
CONCLUSION: Inflammation around alloplastic materials used to repair defects in the abdominal wall persists for many years. There was evidence of long term wound complications as a result of persistent foreign body reactions. Further studies are required to evaluate the long term tissue response to these materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452261     DOI: 10.1080/11024159950189726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  120 in total

1.  Randomised clinical trial: conventional Lichtenstein vs. hernioplasty with self-adhesive mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  Jose L Porrero; María J Castillo; Ana Pérez-Zapata; María T Alonso; Oscar Cano-Valderrama; Esther Quirós; Sol Villar; Beatriz Ramos; Carlos Sánchez-Cabezudo; Oscar Bonachia; Alberto Marcos; Brígido Pérez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  L Melman; E D Jenkins; N A Hamilton; L C Bender; M D Brodt; C R Deeken; S C Greco; M M Frisella; B D Matthews
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material?

Authors:  Michel Cosson; Philippe Debodinance; Malik Boukerrou; M P Chauvet; Pierre Lobry; Gilles Crépin; Anne Ego
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-07-25

4.  Initial experience of double-layer tension free reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant and polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  F M Shaikh; T E Kennedy; E G Kavanagh; P A Grace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Michael S Abdo; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Sutureless hernioplasty with light-weight mesh and fibrin glue versus Lichtenstein procedure: a comparison of outcomes focusing on chronic postoperative pain.

Authors:  R Lionetti; B Neola; S Dilillo; D Bruzzese; G P Ferulano
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Kim Fugate; David McClusky; E Matt Ritter; Andrew Lederman; Dirk Dillehay; C Daniel Smith; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Inge Schmitz; Orlin Belyaev; Robert Grabs; Klaus-Michael Müller; Waldemar Uhl; Volker Zumtobel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Early results of a randomized multicenter trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP).

Authors:  S Bringman; S Wollert; J Osterberg; T Heikkinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  Alexander H Petter-Puchner; R Fortelny; R Mittermayr; W Ohlinger; H Redl
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.