Literature DB >> 28025741

Prospective study evaluating the impact of severity of chronic pain on quality of life after inguinal hernioplasty.

C Nikkolo1, Ü Kirsimägi1, T Vaasna1, M Murruste1, J Suumann1, H Seepter1, U Lepner2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The definition of chronic pain after inguinal hernioplasty and the methods of its assessment vary a great deal, which make it complicated to conduct meta-analyses. The primary aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate at which pain severity degree the quality-of-life scores will be reduced.
METHOD: A prospective study of patients operated for inguinal hernia was conducted. A pain questionnaire and a quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire were completed.
RESULTS: Altogether, 370 patients were investigated and included in analysis. Of them, 33.8% experienced pain during different activities. Compared to the non-pain response group, significantly lower QoL scores for the Bodily pain domain were reported by patients who gave 1, 2, or 3 positive responses to the pain questionnaire. Patients with no pain as well as patients who gave 1 positive response to the pain questionnaire and whose VAS score was ≤20 had similar QoL scores for all domains. Patients who gave 1 positive response to the pain questionnaire and whose VAS score was >20, and patients who gave two or more positive responses to the pain questionnaire, showed significantly lower QoL scores in most of the domains compared with the non-pain group. When the patients who gave 1 positive response to the pain questionnaire and whose VAS score was ≤20 were excluded from the group of patients with pain, the rate of chronic pain was 19.7%. Considering the above result, the reduction in the rate of chronic pain from 33.8 to 19.7% was statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Pain scores 20 mm or less on the VAS (0 to 100 mm) have no impact on the patients' quality of life. Uniform assessment methods of chronic pain should be developed to improve the quality of research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Inguinal hernia; Lichtenstein hernioplasty; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025741     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1569-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  16 in total

1.  Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles.

Authors:  Parviz K Amid
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Ceith Nikkolo; Urmas Lepner
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  E Aasvang; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain.

Authors:  B Page; C Paterson; D Young; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.

Authors:  L N Jorgensen; T Sommer; S Assaadzadeh; L Strand; A Dorfelt; M Hensler; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  D L Sanders; S Waydia
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M Miserez; E Peeters; T Aufenacker; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; L N Jorgensen; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  2 in total

1.  Decreasing prevalence of chronic pain after laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Stina Öberg; Kristoffer Andresen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kjær Jensen; Thomas K Ringsted; Joakim M Bischoff; Morten A Petersen; Jacob Rosenberg; Henrik Kehlet; Mads U Werner
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.