Literature DB >> 22778836

Defining desirable central nervous system drug space through the alignment of molecular properties, in vitro ADME, and safety attributes.

Travis T Wager1, Ramalakshmi Y Chandrasekaran, Xinjun Hou, Matthew D Troutman, Patrick R Verhoest, Anabella Villalobos, Yvonne Will.   

Abstract

As part of our effort to increase survival of drug candidates and to move our medicinal chemistry design to higher probability space for success in the Neuroscience therapeutic area, we embarked on a detailed study of the property space for a collection of central nervous system (CNS) molecules. We carried out a thorough analysis of properties for 119 marketed CNS drugs and a set of 108 Pfizer CNS candidates. In particular, we focused on understanding the relationships between physicochemical properties, in vitro ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) attributes, primary pharmacology binding efficiencies, and in vitro safety data for these two sets of compounds. This scholarship provides guidance for the design of CNS molecules in a property space with increased probability of success and may lead to the identification of druglike candidates with favorable safety profiles that can successfully test hypotheses in the clinic.

Keywords:  CNS candidates; CNS drugs; Central nervous system (CNS); Madin−Darby canine kidney; P-glycoprotein; cellular toxicity; dofetilide binding; drug−drug interactions; high-throughput screening; human liver microsome stability; hydrogen bond donor; ligand efficiency; ligand-efficiency-dependent lipophilicity; ligand-lipophilicity efficiency; lipophilicity; molecular weight; most basic pKa; passive permeability; polarity; topological polar surface area; transformed human liver epithelial cells; unbound intrinsic clearance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22778836      PMCID: PMC3368653          DOI: 10.1021/cn100007x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci        ISSN: 1948-7193            Impact factor:   4.418


  30 in total

Review 1.  Application of hydrogen bonding calculations in property based drug design.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Adam Ibrahim; Andreas M Zissimos; Yuan H Zhao; John Comer; Derek P Reynolds
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Use of physicochemical calculation of pKa and CLogP to predict phospholipidosis-inducing potential: a case study with structurally related piperazines.

Authors:  Jan-Peter H T M Ploemen; Jan Kelder; Theo Hafmans; Han van de Sandt; Johan A van Burgsteden; Paul J M Saleminki; Eric van Esch
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2004-03

3.  Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs.

Authors:  Paul D Leeson; Andrew M Davis
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  The evolution of synthetic oral drug properties.

Authors:  John R Proudfoot
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  Structure-brain exposure relationships.

Authors:  Stephen A Hitchcock; Lewis D Pennington
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 6.  High throughput ADME screening: practical considerations, impact on the portfolio and enabler of in silico ADME models.

Authors:  Cornelis E C A Hop; Mark J Cole; Ralph E Davidson; David B Duignan; James Federico; John S Janiszewski; Kelly Jenkins; Suzanne Krueger; Rebecca Lebowitz; Theodore E Liston; Walter Mitchell; Mark Snyder; Stefan J Steyn; John R Soglia; Christine Taylor; Matt D Troutman; John Umland; Michael West; Kevin M Whalen; Veronica Zelesky; Sabrina X Zhao
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Physiochemical drug properties associated with in vivo toxicological outcomes.

Authors:  Jason D Hughes; Julian Blagg; David A Price; Simon Bailey; Gary A Decrescenzo; Rajesh V Devraj; Edmund Ellsworth; Yvette M Fobian; Michael E Gibbs; Richard W Gilles; Nigel Greene; Enoch Huang; Teresa Krieger-Burke; Jens Loesel; Travis Wager; Larry Whiteley; Yao Zhang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Early evaluation of compound QT prolongation effects: a predictive 384-well fluorescence polarization binding assay for measuring hERG blockade.

Authors:  Matt Deacon; David Singleton; Nikki Szalkai; Rodger Pasieczny; Chris Peacock; David Price; James Boyd; Helen Boyd; Jill V Steidl-Nichols; Christine Williams
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 9.  A review of the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in man.

Authors:  C M Kaye; R E Haddock; P F Langley; G Mellows; T C Tasker; B D Zussman; W H Greb
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

Review 10.  Research perspectives for pre-screening alternatives to animal experimentation: on the relevance of cytotoxicity measurements, barrier passage determinations and high throughput screening in vitro to select potentially hazardous compounds in large sets of chemicals.

Authors:  Erik Walum; Jan Hedander; Per Garberg
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  82 in total

1.  Brain Penetrable Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitor SW-100 Ameliorates Memory and Learning Impairments in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Alan P Kozikowski; Sida Shen; Marta Pardo; Maurício T Tavares; Dora Szarics; Veronick Benoy; Chad A Zimprich; Zsófia Kutil; Guiping Zhang; Cyril Bařinka; Matthew B Robers; Ludo Van Den Bosch; James H Eubanks; Richard S Jope
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  P2X receptor antagonists for pain management: examination of binding and physicochemical properties.

Authors:  Rebecca J Gum; Brian Wakefield; Michael F Jarvis
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 3.  Improving the prediction of the brain disposition for orally administered drugs using BDDCS.

Authors:  Fabio Broccatelli; Caroline A Larregieu; Gabriele Cruciani; Tudor I Oprea; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Finding the sweet spot: the role of nature and nurture in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Michael M Hann; György M Keserü
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  The influence of the 'organizational factor' on compound quality in drug discovery.

Authors:  Paul D Leeson; Stephen A St-Gallay
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Drug discovery: Know your chemical space.

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; G Richard Bickerton
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  Moving beyond rules: the development of a central nervous system multiparameter optimization (CNS MPO) approach to enable alignment of druglike properties.

Authors:  Travis T Wager; Xinjun Hou; Patrick R Verhoest; Anabella Villalobos
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 8.  Reliability of In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Predicting the Effect of P-Glycoprotein on the Delivery of Antidepressants to the Brain.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Xijing Chen; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs.

Authors:  G Richard Bickerton; Gaia V Paolini; Jérémy Besnard; Sorel Muresan; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 24.427

10.  Novel 1,2-dihydroquinazolin-2-ones: Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation against Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  ThanhTruc Pham; Madeline Walden; Christopher Butler; Rosario Diaz-Gonzalez; Guiomar Pérez-Moreno; Gloria Ceballos-Pérez; Veronica Gomez-Pérez; Raquel García-Hernández; Henry Zecca; Emma Krakoff; Brian Kopec; Ogar Ichire; Caden Mackenzie; Marika Pitot; Luis Miguel Ruiz; Francisco Gamarro; Dolores González-Pacanowska; Miguel Navarro; Amy B Dounay
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.