Literature DB >> 22777525

Very low-activity stress/high-activity rest, single-day myocardial perfusion SPECT with a conventional sodium iodide camera and wide beam reconstruction processing.

E Gordon DePuey1, Pashmina Ata, Rick Wray, Marvin Friedman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A stress (S)/rest (R) 1-day Tc-99m sestamibi protocol is logistically advantageous and facilitates stress-only imaging. However, with conventional 370 MBq (10 mCi) S activity and subsequent 1,110-1,295 MBq (30-35 mCi) R activity there is a risk of S-to-R "shine-through" and underestimation of defect reversibility. New software methods cope with lower counting statistics and should allow for both a reduced S activity and also less likelihood of S-to-R "shine-through."
METHODS: 102 prospective patients [49 men, 53 women; mean weight 178 ± 41 lbs (range 98-265 lbs); chest 41.5″ ± 4.0″ (range 32″-52″)] received 192.4 + 18.5 MBq (5.2 ± 0.5 mCi) Tc-99m sestamibi S (25 exercise, 77 regadenoson) activity followed in 30-40 minutes by "full-time" (12 minutes) two-headed NaI camera S SPECT. Immediately thereafter, a 16-minute S SPECT acquisition was also performed in 37/102 patients. Then at 60-80 minute post-S all patients received 1328.3 + 129.5 MBq (35.9 ± 3.5 mCi) Tc-99m sestamibi, and "half-time" (7.5 minutes) R SPECT was acquired. All tomograms were processed with wide beam reconstruction (WBR, UltraSPECT Ltd.) software. A time-adjusted R/S myocardial count density ratio (MCDR) was calculated using automated software. S SPECT quality was visually graded (poor, fair, good, excellent) based upon myocardial definition, cavity contrast, RV visualization, and noise. For comparison, the S/R MCDR was calculated in 581 consecutive patients undergoing a conventional 370 MBq R/1110 MBq S (10 mCi R/30 mCi S) protocol.
RESULTS: S SPECT was normal in 44 patients (43%). Image quality was good-excellent in 93 (91%) patients with 12-minute S SPECT. Also in 37 (98%) patients with 16-minute S SPECT, quality was good-excellent. In patients with >42″ chests 12-minute S SPECT quality worsened with increasing chest circumference, manifested by myocardial "blurring." Image quality improved by ≥1 grade in the 12/37 patients (32%) also undergoing 16-minute S SPECT. The time- and decay-corrected 12-minute mean R/S MCDR was 5.78, a ratio adequate to minimize S-to-R shine-through, as verified in phantom experiments, and significantly better than a 3.79 S/R ratio achieved in the 581 patients undergoing a conventional R/S protocol.
CONCLUSIONS: An approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi S) Tc-99m SPECT processed with WBR provides adequate image quality. For larger patients prolonging image acquisition to 16 minutes is beneficial. For patients with normal S SPECT, a S-only protocol is feasible, affording them a very low (approximately 1.4 mSv) radiation dose. If subsequent R SPECT is necessary, it can be performed with approximately 1,332 MBq (36 mCi) with minimal S-R "shine-through."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777525     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9596-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  10 in total

1.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies.

Authors:  Salvador Borges-Neto; Robert A Pagnanelli; Linda K Shaw; Emily Honeycutt; Shuli C Shwartz; George L Adams; Ralph Edward Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  A comparison of the image quality of full-time myocardial perfusion SPECT vs wide beam reconstruction half-time and half-dose SPECT.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey; Srinivas Bommireddipalli; John Clark; Anna Leykekhman; Linda B Thompson; Marvin Friedman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging a new paradigm.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Kevin W Moser; Randall C Thompson; Manuel D Cerqueira; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain.

Authors:  Peter B Gibson; Diane Demus; Richard Noto; William Hudson; Lynne L Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction "half-time" gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to "full-time" filtered backprojection.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey; Ramesh Gadiraju; John Clark; Linda Thompson; Frank Anstett; Shuli C Shwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Wide beam reconstruction "quarter-time" gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to "full-time" ordered subset expectation maximum.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey; Srinivas Bommireddipalli; John Clark; Linda Thompson; Yossi Srour
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Lynne L Johnson; S James Cullom; James A Case; James R Galt; Ernest V Garcia; Keith Haddock; Kelly L Moutray; Carlos Poston; Eli H Botvinick; Matthews B Fish; William P Follansbee; Sean Hayes; Ami E Iskandrian; John J Mahmarian; William Vandecker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Myocardial perfusion SPECT just keeps getting better and better.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Recent advances in cardiac SPECT instrumentation and system design.

Authors:  Mark F Smith
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  The Private Practice Corner: A new column in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Randall C Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Choosing patients for stress-first/stress-only imaging: Keep it simple.

Authors:  Thomas A Holly
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Stress first myocardial perfusion imaging: is it time to put to rest the "rest first" strategy for most patients?

Authors:  Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Sabha Bhatti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Stress-only imaging: faster, cheaper, less radiation. So what's the hold up?

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; Lori B Croft; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review.

Authors:  B M Pampana Gowd; Gary V Heller; Matthew W Parker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  A world view of nuclear cardiology practices: Think globally, act locally.

Authors:  Thomas A Holly
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state camera: simulation of a very low dose imaging protocol.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Richard Padgett; Yuan Xu; Mark Lemley; Rafael Baavour; Nathaniel Roth; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Optimizing radiation dose and imaging time with conventional myocardial perfusion SPECT: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.