Literature DB >> 22776565

Evaluation of the Essen Rotary as a new technique for bacterial swabs: results of a prospective controlled clinical investigation in 50 patients with chronic leg ulcers.

Philipp Al Ghazal1, Andreas Körber, Joachim Klode, Ernst N Schmid, Jan Buer, Joachim Dissemond.   

Abstract

Most chronic wounds are colonised with different microorganisms, especially problematic bacteria like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which represent an increasing therapeutic challenge in the modern wound therapy regimen. Therefore, it is essential to specify the bacteria in wounds for an individual-specific treatment. In most patients, an exemplary bacterial swab is taken from the centre of the wound surface. This so-called Levine technique is propagated currently as the gold standard. The aim of our clinical investigation was to compare the results of different swab techniques to the new established Essen Rotary. In this monocentric prospective investigation, 50 patients with chronic leg ulcers were examined consecutively. The results of our clinical study show that bacteria are heterogeneously spread on wound surfaces. The analysis of the semiquantitative measured results showed that the Essen Rotary could detect significant more bacteria with a total amount of 111 bacteria (P = 0·049) compared to usual swab techniques. Considerably, only the Essen Rotary identified five compared to three MRSA-patients detected by other techniques. The Essen Rotary is an efficient, economic and uncomplicated modification of bacteriological swab techniques which detects significant more bacteria compared to other conventional swab techniques. Therefore, the Essen Rotary may become the new gold standard in routinely taken bacteriological swabs especially for MRSA screenings in patients with chronic leg ulcers.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Essen Rotary; leg ulcer; Levine technique; MRSA; swab

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22776565      PMCID: PMC7950534          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds.

Authors:  T J Bill; C R Ratliff; A M Donovan; L K Knox; R F Morgan; G T Rodeheaver
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Potential impact of the VITEK 2 system and the Advanced Expert System on the clinical laboratory of a university-based hospital.

Authors:  C C Sanders; M Peyret; E S Moland; S J Cavalieri; C Shubert; K S Thomson; J M Boeufgras; W E Sanders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) -- therapy and hygienic measures].

Authors:  H Linde; N Lehn
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  [When is a wound chronic?].

Authors:  J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection.

Authors:  Sue E Gardner; Rita A Frantz; Charles L Saltzman; Stephen L Hillis; Heeok Park; Melody Scherubel
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds.

Authors:  N S Levine; R B Lindberg; A D Mason; B A Pruitt
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1976-02

7.  Study of the formation of a biofilm by clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Liesse Iyamba; M Seil; M Devleeschouwer; N B Takaisi Kikuni; J P Dehaye
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.209

8.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis carrying biofilm formation genes: detection of clinical isolates by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Natalia L P Iorio; Milena B Azevedo; Vanessa H Frazão; Ariane G Barcellos; Elaine M Barros; Eliezer M Pereira; Cláudio S de Mattos; Kátia R N dos Santos
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Bacterial colonization of chronic leg ulcers: current results compared with data 5 years ago in a specialized dermatology department.

Authors:  A Körber; E N Schmid; J Buer; J Klode; D Schadendorf; J Dissemond
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 6.166

10.  [Bacterial colonization of chronic wounds. Studies on outpatients in a university dermatology clinic with special consideration of ORSA].

Authors:  J Dissemond; E N Schmid; S Esser; M Witthoff; M Goos
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.751

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Current detection rates of multiresistant gram negative bacteria (3MRGN, 4MRGN) in patients with chronic leg ulcers].

Authors:  F Jockenhöfer; H Gollnick; K Herberger; G Isbary; R Renner; M Stücker; E Valesky; U Wollina; M Weichenthal; S Karrer; B Ross; E Heintschel von Heinegg; J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Panton-Valentine leukocidin in patients with chronic wounds. Results from a clinical investigation in 100 patients].

Authors:  C Hammer; P-M Rath; J Steinmann; M Stoffels-Weindorf; J Klode; J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Impact of Gram-negative bacteria on the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Wibke L Engelberg; Martin Dörler; Markus Stücker; Stefanie Reich-Schupke
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  [Chronic wounds and bacteria. Clinical relevance, detection and therapy].

Authors:  J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  SPaCE Swab: Point-of-Care Sensor for Simple and Rapid Detection of Acute Wound Infection.

Authors:  Naing Tun Thet; June Mercer-Chalmers; Rosemary J Greenwood; Amber E R Young; Karen Coy; Simon Booth; Anthony Sack; Andrew T A Jenkins
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 7.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.