Literature DB >> 1255833

The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds.

N S Levine, R B Lindberg, A D Mason, B A Pruitt.   

Abstract

The quantitative swab culture is a reliable method for quantifying the number of viable bacteria colonizing open wounds. For open wounds in burn patients, the swab bacterial count is linearly related to biopsy quantification of viable bacteria in the underlying tissue. This technique is simple and requires no surgical manipulation of the wound. For a wound of uniform appearance, the standard deviation of a single swab culture from the mean log bacterial count for a series of cultures from widely spaced areas on the wound is +/- 0.85 logs; 95% confidence limits are +/- 1.7 logs from the mean. A Gram-stained smear from a wound swab requires less than 10 minutes to prepare. Visualization of bacteria on the smear indicates that 106 or more bacteria per swab are present. The value of the smear and swab techniques for predicting safe wound closure may be inferred from the published reports of others and the direct relationship between the swab and biopsy counts of viable bacteria for open wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1255833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  61 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified Reactive Delphi procedure. Part 2: methodology, analysis and results.

Authors:  Connie L Harris; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review*.

Authors:  Connie L Harris; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Evaluation of the Essen Rotary as a new technique for bacterial swabs: results of a prospective controlled clinical investigation in 50 patients with chronic leg ulcers.

Authors:  Philipp Al Ghazal; Andreas Körber; Joachim Klode; Ernst N Schmid; Jan Buer; Joachim Dissemond
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs.

Authors:  Charne Nicole Miller; Keryln Carville; Nelly Newall; Suzanne Kapp; Gill Lewin; Leila Karimi; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  No need for biopsies: comparison of three sample techniques for wound microbiota determination.

Authors:  Kristine Gjødsbøl; Mette E Skindersoe; Jens Jørgen Christensen; Tonny Karlsmark; Bo Jørgensen; Anders Mørup Jensen; Bjarke M Klein; Michael K Sonnested; Karen A Krogfelt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Development of an experimental model of infected skin ulcer.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Shinichi Hirabayashi; Yoshiyuki Yonehara; Yasutoshi Suzuki; Philip Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  [Infections in trauma and orthopedic surgery].

Authors:  K Dresing
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 9.  The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.

Authors:  Donna E Angel; Peter Lloyd; Keryln Carville; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Microbiologic and clinical value of primary broth cultures of wound specimens collected with swabs.

Authors:  R P Silletti; E Ailey; S Sun; D Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.