Literature DB >> 22773236

Ensuring competency: are fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and certification necessary for practicing surgeons and operating room personnel?

Melanie L Hafford1, Kent R Van Sickle, Ross E Willis, Todd D Wilson, Kristine Gugliuzza, Kimberly M Brown, Daniel J Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certification in fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) is required by the American board of surgery for graduating residents. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and need for certifying practicing surgeons and to assess proficiency of operating room (OR) personnel.
METHODS: Through a patient safety and health care delivery effectiveness grant, investigators at four state medical schools received funding for FLS certification of all attending surgeons and OR personnel credentialed in laparoscopy. Data were voluntarily collected under an institutional review board-approved protocol. Surgeons performed a single repetition of the FLS tasks oriented to the FLS proficiency-based curriculum and online cognitive materials and were encouraged to self-practice. The FLS certification examination was administered 2 months later under standard conditions. Operating room nurses and scrub technicians were enrolled in a curriculum with cognitive materials and a multistation skills practicum. Baseline and completion questionnaires were administered. Performance was assessed using signed-rank and χ(2) analysis.
RESULTS: The study aimed to enroll 99 surgeons. Subsequently, 87 surgeons completed at least one portion of the curriculum, 72 completed the entire curriculum (73% compliance), 83 completed the baseline skills assessment, and 27 (33%) failed. The self-reported practice time was 3.7 ± 2.5 h. At certification (n = 76), skills performance had improved from 317 ± 102.9 to 402 ± 54.2 (p < 0.0001). One surgeon (1.3%) failed the skills certification, and nine (11.8%) failed the cognitive exam. Remediation was completed by six surgeons. Of the 64 enrolled OR personnel, 22 completed the curriculum (34% compliance). All achieved proficiency at skills, and 60% passed the cognitive exam.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that FLS certification for practicing surgeons and proficiency verification for OR personnel are feasible. A baseline skills failure rate of 33% and a certification failure rate of 13% suggest that FLS certification may be necessary to ensure surgeon competency. Fortunately, with only moderate practice, significant improvement can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22773236     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2437-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Proficiency-based Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery skills training results in durable performance improvement and a uniform certification pass rate.

Authors:  Madelyn E Rosenthal; E Matt Ritter; Mouza T Goova; Antonio O Castellvi; Seifu T Tesfay; Elisabeth A Pimentel; Robert Hartzler; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The complexity of measuring interprofessional teamwork in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Andrew N Healey; Shabnam Undre; Nick Sevdalis; Maria Koutantji; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.338

3.  FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; E Matt Ritter; Seifu T Tesfay; Elisabeth A Pimentel; Alykhan Nagji; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  High-fidelity, simulation-based, interdisciplinary operating room team training at the point of care.

Authors:  John T Paige; Valeriy Kozmenko; Tong Yang; Ramnarayan Paragi Gururaja; Charles W Hilton; Isidore Cohn; Sheila W Chauvin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  New directions in simulation-based surgical education and training: validation and transfer of surgical skills, use of nonsurgeons as faculty, use of simulation to screen and select surgery residents, and long-term follow-up of learners.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; Carla M Pugh; E Matthew Ritter; Lenworth M Jacobs; Carlos A Pellegrini; Ajit K Sachdeva
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Two-year skill retention and certification exam performance after fundamentals of laparoscopic skills training and proficiency maintenance.

Authors:  Lauren B Mashaud; Antonio O Castellvi; Lisa A Hollett; Deborah C Hogg; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology.

Authors:  Breno Dauster; Andrew P Steinberg; Melina C Vassiliou; Simon Bergman; Donna D Stanbridge; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  2009 Annual National Patient Safety Foundation Congress: conference proceedings.

Authors:  Doug Bonacum; Janet Corrigan; Lillee Gelinas; Diane C Pinakiewicz; Larry Stepnick
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  21 in total

1.  Development of a novel tool to assess skills in laparoscopic gastrectomy using the Delphi method: the Japanese operative rating scale for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (JORS-LDG).

Authors:  Yo Kurashima; Yusuke Watanabe; Naoki Hiki; Saseem Poudel; Hidehiko Kitagami; Yuma Ebihara; Soichi Murakami; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Are gynecologists sufficiently trained and educated on electro surgery and basic laparoscopic setting?

Authors:  Paola Modaffari; Enrico Panuccio; Giuseppe Zimmiti; Leticia Padilla Mozo; Gloria Cordeiro Vidal; Benoit Rabischong; Nicolas Bourdel; Michel Canis; Revaz Botchorishvili
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of advanced laparoscopic skills tasks for validity evidence.

Authors:  Dmitry Nepomnayshy; James Whitledge; Richard Birkett; Theodore Delmonico; Robin Ruthazer; Lelan Sillin; Neal E Seymour
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Preconditioning in laparoscopic surgery--results of a virtual reality pilot study.

Authors:  M Paschold; T Huber; D W Kauff; K Buchheim; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Ethical considerations regarding the implementation of new technologies and techniques in surgery.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Kenneth A Forde; Bruce V MacFadyen; John D Mellinger; Peter F Crookes; Lelan F Sillin; Phillip P Shadduck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Retention of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) proficiency with a biannual mandatory training session.

Authors:  Lindsay Wenger; Cory Richardson; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgery: Urological laparoscopic training--practice makes perfect.

Authors:  Roger F Valdivieso; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Evaluation of the quality of transesophageal echocardiography images and verification of proficiency.

Authors:  Robina Matyal; Faraz Mahmood; Ziyad Omar Knio; Stephanie Jones; Lu Yeh; Rabina Amir; Ruma Bose; John D Mitchell
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Identifying the needs for teaching fundamental knowledge of laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.

Authors:  Shinichiro Yokoyama; Yusuke Watanabe; Yo Kurashima; Akihiko Oshita; Yuji Nishizawa; Takeshi Naitoh; Fumitaka Nakamura; Satoru Kikuchi; Kazuhiro Noma; Saseem Poudel; Akihiro Suzuki; Yuichi Nishihara; Masaaki Ito; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Individualized feedback during simulated laparoscopic training:a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Liv Ahlborg; Maria Weurlander; Leif Hedman; Henry Nisel; Pelle G Lindqvist; Li Felländer-Tsai; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.