Literature DB >> 25005013

Evaluation of advanced laparoscopic skills tasks for validity evidence.

Dmitry Nepomnayshy1, James Whitledge, Richard Birkett, Theodore Delmonico, Robin Ruthazer, Lelan Sillin, Neal E Seymour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) represents a minimum proficiency standard for laparoscopic surgery, more advanced proficiency standards are required to address the needs of current surgical training. We wanted to evaluate the acceptance and discriminative ability of a novel set of skills building on the FLS model that could represent a more advanced proficiency standard-advanced laparoscopic surgery (ALS).
METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative analyses were employed. Quantitative analysis involved comparison of expert (PGY 5+), intermediate (PGY 3-4) and novice (PGY 1-2) surgeons on FLS and ALS tasks. Composite scores included time and errors. Standard FLS errors were added to task time to create the composite score. Qualitative analysis involved thematic review of open-ended questions provided to experts participating in the study.
RESULTS: Out of 48 participants, there were 15 (31 %) attendings, 3 (6 %) fellows and 30 (63 %) residents. By specialty, 54 % were general/MIS/bariatric/colorectal (GMBC) and 46 % were other (urology and gynecology). There was no difference between experience level and performance on FLS and ALS tasks for the entire cohort. However, looking at the GMBC subgroup, experts performed better than novices (p = 0.012) and intermediates performed better than novices (p = 0.057) on ALS tasks. There was no difference for the same group in FLS performance. Also, GMBC subgroup performed significantly better on FLS (p = 0.0035) and ALS (p = 0.0027) than the other subgroup. Thematic analysis revealed that the majority of experts felt that ALS was more realistic, challenging and clinically relevant for specific situations compared to FLS.
CONCLUSION: For GMBC surgeons, we were able to show evidence of validity for a series of advanced laparoscopic tasks and their relationship to surgeon skill level. This study may represent the first step in the development of an advanced laparoscopic skills curriculum. Given the high degree of specialization in surgery, different advanced skills curricula will need to be developed for each specialty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25005013     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3674-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

Review 1.  Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use?

Authors:  Liane S Feldman; Vadim Sherman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing.

Authors:  Allan Okrainec; Nathaniel J Soper; Lee L Swanstrom; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  G M Fried; A M Derossis; J Bothwell; H H Sigman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Gerald M Fried; Kaaren I Hoffman; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience.

Authors:  Richard H Bell; Thomas W Biester; Arnold Tabuenca; Robert S Rhodes; Joseph B Cofer; L D Britt; Frank R Lewis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors.

Authors:  Samer G Mattar; Adnan A Alseidi; Daniel B Jones; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Lee L Swanstrom; Ralph W Aye; Steven D Wexner; José M Martinez; Sharona B Ross; Michael M Awad; Morris E Franklin; Maurice E Arregui; Bruce D Schirmer; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Why Johnny cannot operate.

Authors:  Richard H Bell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Surgical residents' perception of competence and relevance of the clinical curriculum to future practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey Scott Fronza; Jay P Prystowsky; Debra DaRosa; Jonathan P Fryer
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.891

View more
  8 in total

1.  New models for advanced laparoscopic suturing: taking it to the next level.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Katherine M McKendy; Elif Bilgic; Ghada Enani; Amin Madani; Amani Munshi; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  What are the skills that represent expert-level laparoscopic suturing? A Delphi Study.

Authors:  Rachel Mathis; Yusuke Watanabe; Iman Ghaderi; Dmitry Nepomnayshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Simulation platforms to assess laparoscopic suturing skills: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Motaz Alyafi; Tomonori Hada; Tara Landry; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Establishing meaningful benchmarks: the development of a formative feedback tool for advanced laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Katherine M McKendy; Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ghada Enani; Amani Munshi; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  A scoping review of assessment tools for laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Satoshi Endo; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Madoka Takao; Katherine M McKendy; Yusuke Watanabe; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Introducing advanced surgical tasks simulation for surgical training.

Authors:  Faiz Tuma; Lisa M Knowlton; Aussama K Nassar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 8.  Simulation for Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Lisa Parker; Suvranu De; Muneera Kapadia; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.878

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.