Jami C Levine1,2, Tal Geva3,4, David W Brown3,4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jami.levine@cardio.chboston.org. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jami.levine@cardio.chboston.org. 3. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: There is currently great interest in measuring trainee competency at all levels of medical education. In 2007, we implemented a system for assessing cardiology fellows' progress in attaining imaging skills. This paradigm could be adapted for use by other cardiology programs. METHODS: Evaluation consisted of a two-part exercise performed after years 1 and 2 of pediatric cardiology training. Part 1: a directly observed evaluation of technical skills as fellows imaged a normal subject (year 1) and a patient with complex heart disease (year 2). Part 2: fellows interpreted and wrote reports for two echocardiograms illustrating congenital heart disease. These were graded for accuracy and facility with communicating pertinent data. After 5 years of testing, fellows were surveyed about their experience. In 5 years, 40 fellows were tested at least once. Testing identified four fellows who underperformed on the technical portion and four on the interpretive portion. Surveys were completed by 33 fellows (83 %). Most (67 %) felt that intermittent observation by faculty was inadequate for assessing skills and that procedural volume was a poor surrogate for competency (58 %). Posttest feedback was constructive and valuable for 90, and 70 % felt the process helped them set goals for skill improvement. Overall, fellows felt this testing was fair and should continue. Fellow performance and responses identified programmatic issues that were creating barriers to learning. We describe a practical test to assess competency for cardiology fellows learning echocardiography. This paradigm is feasible, has excellent acceptance among trainees, and identifies trainees who need support. Materials developed could be easily adapted to help track upcoming ACGME-mandated metrics.
UNLABELLED: There is currently great interest in measuring trainee competency at all levels of medical education. In 2007, we implemented a system for assessing cardiology fellows' progress in attaining imaging skills. This paradigm could be adapted for use by other cardiology programs. METHODS: Evaluation consisted of a two-part exercise performed after years 1 and 2 of pediatric cardiology training. Part 1: a directly observed evaluation of technical skills as fellows imaged a normal subject (year 1) and a patient with complex heart disease (year 2). Part 2: fellows interpreted and wrote reports for two echocardiograms illustrating congenital heart disease. These were graded for accuracy and facility with communicating pertinent data. After 5 years of testing, fellows were surveyed about their experience. In 5 years, 40 fellows were tested at least once. Testing identified four fellows who underperformed on the technical portion and four on the interpretive portion. Surveys were completed by 33 fellows (83 %). Most (67 %) felt that intermittent observation by faculty was inadequate for assessing skills and that procedural volume was a poor surrogate for competency (58 %). Posttest feedback was constructive and valuable for 90, and 70 % felt the process helped them set goals for skill improvement. Overall, fellows felt this testing was fair and should continue. Fellow performance and responses identified programmatic issues that were creating barriers to learning. We describe a practical test to assess competency for cardiology fellows learning echocardiography. This paradigm is feasible, has excellent acceptance among trainees, and identifies trainees who need support. Materials developed could be easily adapted to help track upcoming ACGME-mandated metrics.
Authors: Chelliah R Selvasekar; Stefan D Holubar; Rajesh Pendlimari; Gregory D Kennedy; William S Harmsen; Jeff R Harrington; Heidi Nelson Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: B Price Kerfoot; Yineng Fu; Harley Baker; Donna Connelly; Michael L Ritchey; Elizabeth M Genega Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Estée C Grant; Vincent J Grant; Farhan Bhanji; Jonathan P Duff; Adam Cheng; Jocelyn M Lockyer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Shubhika Srivastava; Beth F Printz; Tal Geva; Girish S Shirali; Paul M Weinberg; Pierre C Wong; Peter Lang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Brian R White; Kasey J Chaszczewski; Bethan Lemley; Shobha S Natarajan; Lindsay S Rogers Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 1.023