Literature DB >> 15701497

Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision.

Anthony G Gallagher1, E Matt Ritter, Andrew B Lederman, David A McClusky, C Daniel Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loss of depth cues is a major challenge facing surgeons performing video-assisted surgery (VAS). Whether the degradation of image quality from a video-displayed image plays a direct role in performance of VAS has not been studied.
METHODS: Twenty-four volunteer novice subjects were randomized to binocular direct-vision (BDV), monocular direct-vision (MDV), or video-imaging (VI) conditions. Each subject completed ten trials of a simple cutting task in a box trainer using standard laparoscopic instruments.
RESULTS: VI subjects made significantly fewer correct incisions than both of the other groups for all trials. Differences between the BDV and MDV groups did not reach statistical significance. Improvement in performance was more rapid in the BDV group than in either the MDV or VI groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The degradation of image quality with VI has a detrimental influence on VAS performance above and beyond the loss of binocular vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15701497     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for surgical novices.

Authors:  Emmeline Nugent; Nicole Shirilla; Adnan Hafeez; Diarmuid S O'Riordain; Oscar Traynor; Anthony M Harrison; Paul Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Aung Myint Oo; Sang-Yong Son; Dong Joon Shin; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Takeo Nomi; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The role of hand motion connectivity in the performance of laparoscopic procedures on a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Constantinos Rouseas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Authors:  B Alaraimi; W El Bakbak; S Sarker; S Makkiyah; A Al-Marzouq; R Goriparthi; A Bouhelal; V Quan; B Patel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.

Authors:  D Wilhelm; S Reiser; N Kohn; M Witte; U Leiner; L Mühlbach; D Ruschin; W Reiner; H Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of examinees' stereopsis and near visual acuity on laparoscopic virtual reality performance.

Authors:  Henry Hoffmann; Rebecca Ruiz-Schirinzi; David Goldblum; Salome Dell-Kuster; Daniel Oertli; Dieter Hahnloser; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  A feasibility study of the use of computed virtual chromoendoscopy for laparoscopic evaluation of peritoneal metastases.

Authors:  Haythem Najah; Réa Lo Dico; Anthony Dohan; Lucy Marry; Clarisse Eveno; Marc Pocard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  3D endoscopic ear surgery: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Daniele Bernardeschi; Ghizlene Lahlou; Daniele De Seta; Francesca Yoshie Russo; Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.