Literature DB >> 22772511

A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU.

A M Jagadeesh1, Naveen G Singh, Subramanyam Mahankali.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement and display of arterial blood pressure is essential for rational management of adult cardiac surgical patients. Because of the lower risk of complications, noninvasive monitoring methods gain importance. A newly developed continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (CNAP™) monitor is available and has been validated perioperatively. In a prospective study we compared the CNAP™ monitoring device with invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) measurement in 30 patients in a cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patients were either mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing, with or without inotropes. CNAP™ was applied on two fingers of the hand contralateral to the IAP monitoring catheter. Systolic, diastolic and mean pressure data were recorded every minute for 2 h simultaneously for both IAP and CNAP™. Statistical analysis included construction of mountain plot and Bland Altman plots for assessing limits of agreement and bias (accuracy) calculation. Three thousand and six hundred pairs of data were analyzed. The CNAP™ systolic arterial pressure bias was 10.415 mmHg and the CNAP™ diastolic arterial pressure bias was -5.3386 mmHg; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of CNAP™ was close to the MAP of IAP, with a bias of 0.03944 mmHg. The Bland Altman plot showed a uniform distribution and a good agreement of all arterial blood pressure values between CNAP™ and IAP. Percentage within limits of agreement was 94.5%, 95.1% and 99.4% for systolic, diastolic and MAP. Calculated limits of agreement were -4.60 to 25.43, -13.38 to 2.70 and -5.95 to 6.03 mmHg for systolic, diastolic and mean BP, respectively. The mountain plot showed similar results as the Bland Altman plots. We conclude CNAP™ is a reliable, noninvasive, continuous blood pressure monitor that provides real-time estimates of arterial pressure comparable to those generated by an invasive arterial catheter system. CNAP™ can be used as an alternative to IAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22772511     DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.97973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth        ISSN: 0971-9784


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of Invasive and Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements for Assessing Signal Complexity and Surgical Risk in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Lauren E Gibson; Teresa S Henriques; Madalena D Costa; Roger B Davis; Murray A Mittleman; Pooja Mathur; Balachundhar Subramaniam
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Ileana Negulescu; Miriam Schöfthaler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Agnes S Meidert; Wolfgang Huber; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  When should we adopt continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies into clinical routine?

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

5.  Tetrahydrobiopterin ameliorates the exaggerated exercise pressor response in patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ann M Lin; Peizhou Liao; Erin C Millson; Arshed A Quyyumi; Jeanie Park
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2016-03-09

Review 6.  A Review of Noninvasive Methodologies to Estimate the Blood Pressure Waveform.

Authors:  Tasbiraha Athaya; Sunwoong Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Julian Grond; Jürgen Fortin; Ileana Negulescu; Miriam Schöfthaler; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Evaluation of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring during induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G Anil Kumar; A M Jagadeesh; Naveen G Singh; S R Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01

9.  Comparison between noninvasive measurement of central venous pressure using near infrared spectroscopy with an invasive central venous pressure monitoring in cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  N Sathish; Naveen G Singh; P S Nagaraja; B M Sarala; C G Prabhushankar; Manasa Dhananjaya; N Manjunatha
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Noninvasive continuous versus intermittent arterial pressure monitoring: evaluation of the vascular unloading technique (CNAP device) in the emergency department.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Julia S Prantner; Agnes S Meidert; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.