Literature DB >> 22763577

Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital.

Marco Braga1, Cristina Ridolfi, Gianpaolo Balzano, Renato Castoldi, Nicolò Pecorelli, Valerio Di Carlo.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for benign and borderline pancreatic lesions is recently becoming the treatment of choice in experienced centres. No data have been published on learning curve so far. The purpose of this study was to identify the learning curve period for performing LDP. Between March 2009 and August 2010 all patients with lesions of pancreatic body or tail were assessed for eligibility for LDP. Exclusion criteria were: major vessels contact in cancer patients, severe organ dysfunction, BMI > 35, and refusing laparoscopic approach. All laparoscopic procedures were carried out by the same surgical team with large experience in open pancreatic surgery. All patients were treated according to an early recovery after surgery protocol. Primary endpoint was conversion rate. Secondary endpoints were operative time, operative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, and length of stay (LOS). Sixty patients were assessed for eligibility. Thirty (50.0 %) patients met the exclusion criteria, while the other 30 patients underwent LDP. Spleen-preserving procedure was planned in the 17 patients with benign lesion and successfully performed in 15 (82.3 %). Overall conversion rate was 23.3 %, but it dropped significantly after the first ten patients (p = 0.01). Mean operative time progressively declined from 254 min in the first subgroup of ten patients to 206 min in the second (p = 0.09 vs. first), and 183 min in the third subgroup (p = 0.006 vs. first). No significant difference was found for operative blood loss, postoperative morbidity rate, and LOS in the different subgroups. Both conversion rate and operative time dropped after the first ten patients who underwent LDP. Strict selection criteria, high-volume hospital, and experienced team in open pancreatic surgery may have played a role in shortening the learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763577     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-012-0163-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  26 in total

1.  Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

Authors:  David A Kooby; Theresa Gillespie; David Bentrem; Attila Nakeeb; Max C Schmidt; Nipun B Merchant; Alex A Parikh; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Syed Ahmad; Hong Jin Kim; Jaemin Park; Fabian Johnston; Matthew J Strouch; Alex Menze; Jennifer Rymer; Rebecca McClaine; Steven M Strasberg; Mark S Talamonti; Charles A Staley; Kelly M McMasters; Andrew M Lowy; Johnita Byrd-Sellers; William C Wood; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  G Balzano; A Zerbi; M Braga; S Rocchetti; A A Beneduce; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Pancreatic islet cell tumors.

Authors:  T A Broughan; J D Leslie; J M Soto; R E Hermann
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection.

Authors:  M Braga; M Frasson; W Zuliani; A Vignali; N Pecorelli; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp; M F Herrera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Lu Feng; Jichun Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Sjors Klompmaker; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Michael L Kendrick; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation: challenges in measuring the learning curve.

Authors:  Alex B Blair; Jonathan G Sham
Journal:  Laparosc Surg       Date:  2018-10-30

4.  The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre.

Authors:  Murtaza Shakir; Brian A Boone; Patricio M Polanco; Mazen S Zenati; Melissa E Hogg; Allan Tsung; Haroon A Choudry; A James Moser; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Parenchyma-sparing surgery for pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Fara Uccelli; F Gavazzi; G Capretti; M Virdis; M Montorsi; A Zerbi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-10-05

6.  The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Niccolò Napoli; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Vittorio Grazio Perrone; Mario Miccoli; Stefania Brozzetti; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-05-20

7.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve?

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Salvatore Buscemi; Giovanni Taffurelli; Marielda D'Ambra; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Emmanuel I Benizri; Adeline Germain; Ahmet Ayav; Jean-Louis Bernard; Rasa Zarnegar; Daniel Benchimol; Laurent Bresler; Laurent Brunaud
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-11-23

Review 9.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

Review 10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Bulent Salman; Tonguc Utku Yilmaz; Kursat Dikmen; Mehmet Kaplan
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.